Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.55 1395-1406 October 2012. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0153)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Frequency Response of Synthetic Vocal Fold Models With Linear and Nonlinear Material Properties

Stephanie M. Shawa
Scott L. Thomsona
Christopher Dromeya
Simeon Smitha

a Brigham Young University, Provo, UT

Correspondence to Scott L. Thomson: thomson{at}byu.edu

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to create synthetic vocal fold models with nonlinear stress-strain properties and to investigate the effect of linear versus nonlinear material properties on fundamental frequency (F 0) during anterior–posterior stretching.

Method: Three materially linear and 3 materially nonlinear models were created and stretched up to 10 mm in 1-mm increments. Phonation onset pressure (P on) and F 0 at P on were recorded for each length. Measurements were repeated as the models were relaxed in 1-mm increments back to their resting lengths, and tensile tests were conducted to determine the stress-strain responses of linear versus nonlinear models.

Results: Nonlinear models demonstrated a more substantial frequency response than did linear models and a more predictable pattern of F 0 increase with respect to increasing length (although range was inconsistent across models). P on generally increased with increasing vocal fold length for nonlinear models, whereas for linear models, P on decreased with increasing length.

Conclusion: Nonlinear synthetic models appear to more accurately represent the human vocal folds than do linear models, especially with respect to F 0 response.

KEY WORDS: voice production, vocal fold modeling, fundamental frequency response, phonation onset pressure, nonlinear stress-strain


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?