Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.55 1314-1328 October 2012. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0320)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, S. E.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Heard, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, S. E.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Heard, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Bilingual Children With Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Language and Memory Skills

Selena Ee-Li Younga,,b
Alison Anne Purcellb
Kirrie Jane Ballardb
Susan Jane Rickard Liowc
Sara Da Silva Ramosd
Robert Heardb
a Kandang Kerbau Hospital, Singapore
b University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
c National University of Singapore
d Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland

Correspondence to Selena Ee-Li Young: selena.young.el{at}kkh.com.sg

Purpose: Research shows that monolingual children with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) have a higher incidence of cognitive-linguistic deficits, but it is not clear whether bilingual preschool children with CLP are especially vulnerable because they need to acquire 2 languages. We tested the hypothesis that bilingual children with CLP score lower than bilingual children with typical development (TD) on receptive vocabulary, verbal memory, and visuospatial memory.

Method: Participants were 86 bilingual CLP children and 100 TD children 3–6 years of age, dominant in English or Mandarin. Each child completed assessments of English and Mandarin vocabulary, verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory, hearing, and articulation.

Results: With analysis of covariance controlling for age and dominant language, no group differences were found between the CLP and TD bilingual children, although a correlational analysis indicated discrepancies in the relationship between variables.

Conclusions: The findings do not support the hypothesis that preschool children with CLP score lower than preschool children with TD on receptive vocabulary and memory measures. Longitudinal research examining literacy skill development is needed to establish whether the deficits reported for school-age monolingual children with CLP become more obvious in bilingual children in later years, especially when the medium of instruction is the child's nondominant language.

KEY WORDS: cleft lip and palate, language, working memory, children, bilingual


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?