Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.55 194-209 February 2012. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0008)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Besser, J.
Right arrow Articles by Festen, J. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Besser, J.
Right arrow Articles by Festen, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

New Measures of Masked Text Recognition in Relation to Speech-in-Noise Perception and Their Associations With Age and Cognitive Abilities

Jana Bessera
Adriana A. Zekvelda,,b,,c
Sophia E. Kramera
Jerker Rönnbergb,,c
Joost M. Festena
a VU University Medical Center, The EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
b Linnaeus Centre HEAD, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Sweden
c Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Correspondence to Jana Besser: j.besser{at}vumc.nl

Purpose: In this research, the authors aimed to increase the analogy between Text Reception Threshold (TRT; Zekveld, George, Kramer, Goverts, & Houtgast, 2007) and Speech Reception Threshold (SRT; Plomp & Mimpen, 1979) and to examine the TRT's value in estimating cognitive abilities that are important for speech comprehension in noise.

Method: The authors administered 5 TRT versions, SRT tests in stationary (SRTSTAT) and modulated (SRTMOD) noise, and 2 cognitive tests: a reading span (RSpan) test for working memory capacity and a letter–digit substitution test for information-processing speed. Fifty-five adults with normal hearing (18–78 years, M = 44 years) participated. The authors examined mutual associations of the tests and their predictive value for the SRTs with correlation and linear regression analyses.

Results: SRTs and TRTs were well associated, also when controlling for age. Correlations for the SRTSTAT were generally lower than for the SRTMOD. The cognitive tests were correlated to the SRTs only when age was not controlled for. Age and the TRTs were the only significant predictors of SRTMOD. SRTSTAT was predicted by level of education and some of the TRT versions.

Conclusions: TRTs and SRTs are robustly associated, nearly independent of age. The association between SRTs and RSpan is largely age dependent. The TRT test and the RSpan test measure different nonauditory components of linguistic processing relevant for speech perception in noise.

KEY WORDS: masked text recognition, speech perception, cognitive abilities, age, working memory


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?