Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.55 139-153 February 2012. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0330)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bouton, S.
Right arrow Articles by Colé, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bouton, S.
Right arrow Articles by Colé, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Perception of Speech Features by French-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants

Sophie Boutona,,b
Willy Serniclaesb
Josiane Bertoncinib
Pascale Coléa
a Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
b Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France

Correspondence to Sophie Bouton: Sophie.Bouton{at}univ-provence.fr

Purpose: The present study investigates the perception of phonological features in French-speaking children with cochlear implants (CIs) compared with normal-hearing (NH) children matched for listening age.

Method: Scores for discrimination and identification of minimal pairs for all features defining consonants (e.g., place, voicing, manner, nasality) and vowels (e.g., frontness, nasality, aperture) were measured in each listener.

Results: The results indicated no differences in "categorical perception," specified as a similar difference between discrimination and identification between CI children and controls. However, CI children demonstrated a lower level of "categorical precision," that is, lesser accuracy in both feature identification and discrimination, than NH children, with the magnitude of the deficit depending on the feature.

Conclusions: If sensitive periods of language development extend well beyond the moment of implantation, the consequences of hearing deprivation for the acquisition of categorical perception should be fairly important in comparison to categorical precision because categorical precision develops more slowly than categorical perception in NH children. These results do not support the idea that the sensitive period for development of categorical perception is restricted to the first 1–2 years of life. The sensitive period may be significantly longer. Differences in precision may reflect the acoustic limitations of the cochlear implant, such as coding for temporal fine structure and frequency resolution.

KEY WORDS: categorical perception, phonological features, cochlear implant, speech development


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?