HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Horn, J. H. Articles by Durrant, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Horn, J. H. Articles by Durrant, J. D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Parameters to Maximize 2f2-f1 Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Levels

Sheila R. Pratt
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System and University of Pittsburgh

John D. Durrant
University of Pittsburgh

Contact author: Jennifer H. Horn, Department of Communication Science and Disorders, 4033 Forbes Tower, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. E-mail: jhhst15{at}pitt.edu.

Purpose: Past research has established parameters for the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) that enhance response levels (e.g., L1 – L2 = 10 dB; f2/f1 = 1.22; L1, L2 = 65, 55 dB SPL). These same parameters do not optimize 2f2-f1 DPOAEs. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate more completely those parameters that produce the most robust 2f2-f1 output.

Method: Input–output functions of the 2f2-f1 component were obtained from 20 normal-hearing adults (with f2 = 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz). Frequency ratios, level differences, and overall sound levels were manipulated with parameter combinations chosen to expand on information established in previous studies. The DPOAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), response presence, and output levels were measured.

Results: In general, mean SNRs and 2f2-f1 levels were greater, and DPOAEs were present more often for 2000 than for 4000 Hz across all parameter combinations. No single parameter combination resulted in pronounced maxima for 2f2-f1, which is consistent with past studies but is in sharp contrast to results for the more familiar 2f1-f2.

Conclusions: Overall, the results suggest that to maximize the 2f2-f1 level, lower test frequencies, low frequency ratio, essentially equal levels of primary tones, and moderate stimulus levels are best, and such parameters might be important for applying DPOAE measurement to assessment of normal and impaired auditory function.

KEY WORDS: distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), parameters, 2f2-f1, input–output functions

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?