JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.51 1607-1619 December 2008. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0069)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kewley-Port, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kewley-Port, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

The Effects of Auditory–Visual Vowel Identification Training on Speech Recognition Under Difficult Listening Conditions

Carolyn Richie
Diane Kewley-Port

Indiana University, Bloomington

Contact author: Carolyn Richie, who is now at the Department of Communication Disorders, Butler University, 4600 Sunset Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46208. E-mail: crichie{at}butler.edu.

Purpose: The effective use of visual cues to speech provides benefit for adults with normal hearing in noisy environments and for adults with hearing loss in everyday communication. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a computer-based, auditory–visual vowel identification training program on sentence recognition under difficult listening conditions.

Method: Normal-hearing adults were trained and tested under auditory–visual conditions, in noise designed to simulate the effects of a hearing loss. After initial tests of vowel, word, and sentence recognition, 1 group of participants received training on identification of 10 American English vowels in CVC context. Another group of participants received no training. All participants were then retested on vowel, word, and sentence recognition.

Results: Improvements were seen for trained compared with untrained participants, in auditory–visual speech recognition under difficult listening conditions, for vowels in monosyllables and key words in sentences.

Conclusions: Results from this study suggest benefit may be gained from this computer-based, auditory–visual vowel identification training method.

KEY WORDS: auditory–visual, speech perception, vowels


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.