|
|
||||||||
Letters to the Editor |
Contact author: Erich Hartmann, Institute of Special Education, University of Fribourg, Petrus-Kanisius-Gasse 21, CH-1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Purpose: This comment refers to a recent study of S. Rvachew and M. Grawburg (2006) that compared the fit of 2 models of the relationships among speech perception, receptive vocabulary, articulation, phonological awareness, and emergent literacy knowledge in preschoolers with speech sound disorders.
Conclusion: It is argued that phonological working memory is an important additional variable to be included in the model preferred by Rvachew and Grawburg (2006). Furthermore, the model should take into account the reciprocal relationship between phonological awareness and emergent literacy skills that is already evident at the preschool level. This could lead to a more precise assessment of preschoolers with speech impairment and, above all, to more efficient preventive intervention.
KEY WORDS: phonological working memory, effective intervention, reciprocal relationships, phonological awareness, speech-language impairment
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Rvachew and M. Grawburg Reflections on Phonological Working Memory, Letter Knowledge, and Phonological Awareness: A Reply to Hartmann (2008) J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2008; 51(5): 1219 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASHA Journals | AJA | AJSLP | JSLHR | LSHSS |