Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.51 97-119 February 2008. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/007)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gillam, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Friel-Patti, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gillam, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Friel-Patti, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Editors' Awards
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Efficacy of Fast ForWord Language Intervention in School-Age Children With Language Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ronald B. Gillam
Utah State University, Logan

Diane Frome Loeb
The University of Kansas, Lawrence

LaVae M. Hoffman
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City

Thomas Bohman
Craig A. Champlin

The University of Texas at Austin

Linda Thibodeau
The University of Texas at Dallas

Judith Widen
Jayne Brandel

The University of Kansas, Lawrence

Sandy Friel-Patti
The University of Texas at Dallas

Contact author: Ronald B. Gillam, Department of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, 1000 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322. E-mail: ron.gillam{at}usu.edu.

Purpose: A randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the language and auditory processing outcomes of children assigned to receive the Fast ForWord Language intervention (FFW-L) with the outcomes of children assigned to nonspecific or specific language intervention comparison treatments that did not contain modified speech.

Method: Two hundred sixteen children between the ages of 6 and 9 years with language impairments were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 conditions: (a) Fast ForWord Language (FFW-L), (b) academic enrichment (AE), (c) computer-assisted language intervention (CALI), or (d) individualized language intervention (ILI) provided by a speech-language pathologist. All children received 1 hr and 40 min of treatment, 5 days per week, for 6 weeks. Language and auditory processing measures were administered to the children by blinded examiners before treatment, immediately after treatment, 3 months after treatment, and 6 months after treatment.

Results: The children in all 4 conditions improved significantly on a global language test and a test of backward masking. Children with poor backward masking scores who were randomized to the FFW-L condition did not present greater improvement on the language measures than children with poor backward masking scores who were randomized to the other 3 conditions. Effect sizes, analyses of standard error of measurement, and normalization percentages supported the clinical significance of the improvements on the Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (E. Carrow-Woolfolk, 1999). There was a treatment effect for the Blending Words subtest of the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (R. K. Wagner, J. K. Torgesen, & C. A. Rashotte, 1999). Participants in the FFW-L and CALI conditions earned higher phonological awareness scores than children in the ILI and AE conditions at the 6-month follow-up testing.

Conclusion: Fast ForWord Language, the intervention that provided modified speech to address a hypothesized underlying auditory processing deficit, was not more effective at improving general language skills or temporal processing skills than a nonspecific comparison treatment (AE) or specific language intervention comparison treatments (CALI and ILI) that did not contain modified speech stimuli. These findings call into question the temporal processing hypothesis of language impairment and the hypothesized benefits of using acoustically modified speech to improve language skills. The finding that children in the 3 treatment conditions and the active comparison condition made clinically relevant gains on measures of language and temporal auditory processing informs our understanding of the variety of intervention activities that can facilitate development.

KEY WORDS: Fast ForWord, language intervention, auditory processing, clinical trial


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
B. K. Gorman
Relationships Between Vocabulary Size, Working Memory, and Phonological Awareness in Spanish-Speaking English Language Learners
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2012; 21(2): 109 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. M. Hoffman, D. F. Loeb, J. Brandel, and R. B. Gillam
Concurrent and Construct Validity of Oral Language Measures With School-Age Children With Specific Language Impairment
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2011; 54(6): 1597 - 1608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
P. Colozzo, R. B. Gillam, M. Wood, R. D. Schnell, and J. R. Johnston
Content and Form in the Narratives of Children With Specific Language Impairment
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2011; 54(6): 1609 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
C. A. Dollaghan
Taxometric Analyses of Specific Language Impairment in 6-Year-Old Children
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2011; 54(5): 1361 - 1371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
K. D. Ebert and K. Kohnert
Sustained Attention in Children With Primary Language Impairment: A Meta-Analysis
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2011; 54(5): 1372 - 1384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
C. A. Miller
Auditory Processing Theories of Language Disorders: Past, Present, and Future
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2011; 42(3): 309 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically DiverHome page
D. F. Loeb, K. Redbird, and G. E. McConnell
A Language and Literacy Program for Indigenous Kindergartners: Preliminary Findings
Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations, July 1, 2011; 18(2): 42 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
A. G. Kamhi
What Speech-Language Pathologists Need to Know About Auditory Processing Disorder
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2011; 42(3): 265 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
M. E. Fey, G. J. Richard, D. Geffner, A. G. Kamhi, L. Medwetsky, D. Paul, D. Ross-Swain, G. P. Wallach, T. Frymark, and T. Schooling
Auditory Processing Disorder and Auditory/Language Interventions: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2011; 42(3): 246 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Word of MouthHome page
Word of Mouth
Word of Mouth, January 1, 2011; 22(3): 1 - 16.
[PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
J. A. G. Lum and M. Zarafa
Relationship Between Verbal Working Memory and the SCAN-C in Children With Specific Language Impairment
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, October 1, 2010; 41(4): 521 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Word of MouthHome page
Word of Mouth: A newsletter dedicated to speech & language in school-age children
Word of Mouth, May 1, 2010; 21(5): 1 - 16.
[PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
D. Bahr and S. Rosenfeld-Johnson
Treatment of Children With Speech Oral Placement Disorders (OPDs): A Paradigm Emerges
Communication Disorders Quarterly, May 1, 2010; 31(3): 131 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
M. E. Fey, L. H. Finestack, B. J. Gajewski, M. Popescu, and J. D. Lewine
A Preliminary Evaluation of Fast ForWord-Language as an Adjuvant Treatment in Language Intervention
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2010; 53(2): 430 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
J. W. Montgomery, B. M. Magimairaj, and M. C. Finney
Working Memory and Specific Language Impairment: An Update on the Relation and Perspectives on Assessment and Treatment
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2010; 19(1): 78 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
D. F. Loeb, R. B. Gillam, L. Hoffman, J. Brandel, and J. Marquis
The Effects of Fast ForWord Language on the Phonemic Awareness and Reading Skills of School-Age Children With Language Impairments and Poor Reading Skills
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2009; 18(4): 376 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
School-Based IssuesHome page
D. F. Loeb and D. B. Daniels
Administration of a Literacy-Based Curriculum by Teacher and SLP Teams
School-Based Issues, October 1, 2009; 10(3): 73 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. A. Abrams, T. Nicol, S. Zecker, and N. Kraus
Abnormal Cortical Processing of the Syllable Rate of Speech in Poor Readers
J. Neurosci., June 17, 2009; 29(24): 7686 - 7693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
L. S. DeThorne, C. J. Johnson, L. Walder, and J. Mahurin-Smith
When "Simon Says" Doesn't Work: Alternatives to Imitation for Facilitating Early Speech Development
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2009; 18(2): 133 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
D. R Moore, L. F Halliday, and S. Amitay
Use of auditory learning to manage listening problems in children
Phil Trans R Soc B, February 12, 2009; 364(1515): 409 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
First LanguageHome page
S. Camarata, K. E. Nelson, H. Gillum, and M. Camarata
Incidental receptive language growth associated with expressive grammar intervention in SLI
First Language, February 1, 2009; 29(1): 51 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]