HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Trudeau, N. Articles by Morford, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Trudeau, N. Articles by Morford, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Construction of Graphic Symbol Utterances by Children, Teenagers, and Adults: The Effect of Structure and Task Demands

Emmanuelle Dagenais
Share Family and Community Services, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Sophie de Broeck
Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal

Jill Morford
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

Contact author: Natacha Trudeau, 2375 Côte Ste-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1A8, Canada. E-mail: Natacha.Trudeau{at}umontreal.ca.

Purpose: This study investigated the impact of syntactic complexity and task demands on construction of utterances using picture communication symbols by participants from 3 age groups with no communication disorders.

Method: Participants were 30 children (7;0 [years;months] to 8;11), 30 teenagers (12;0 to 13;11), and 30 adults (18 years and above). All participants constructed graphic symbol utterances to describe photographs presented with spoken French stimuli. Stimuli included simple and complex (object relative and subject relative) utterances describing the photographs, which were presented either 1 at a time (neutral condition) or in an array of 4 (contrast condition).

Results: Simple utterances lead to more uniform response patterns than complex utterances. Among complex utterances, subject relative sentences appeared more difficult to convey. Increasing the need for message clarity (i.e., contrast condition) elicited changes in the production of graphic symbol sequences for complex propositions. The effects of syntactic complexity and task demands were more pronounced for children.

Conclusion: Graphic symbol utterance construction appears to involve more than simply transferring spoken language skills. One possible explanation is that this type of task requires higher levels of metalinguistic ability. Clinical implications and directions for further research are discussed.

KEY WORDS: augmentative/alternative communication, speakers with native proficiency, graphic systems

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Fey Thoughts on Grammar Intervention in AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication, June 1, 2008; 17(2): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]