HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Green, J. R. Articles by Moore, C. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Green, J. R. Articles by Moore, C. A.

Estimating Mandibular Motion Based on Chin Surface Targets During Speech

Erin M. Wilson
Waisman Center

Yu-Tsai Wang
School of Dentistry, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan

Christopher A. Moore
University of Washington, Seattle

Contact author: Jordan R. Green, Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 318 Barkley Center, Lincoln, NE 68583. E-mail: jgreen4{at}unl.edu.

Purpose: The movement of the jaw during speech and chewing has frequently been studied by tracking surface landmarks on the chin. However, the extent to which chin motions accurately represent those of the underlying mandible remains in question. In this investigation, the movements of a pellet attached to the incisor of the mandible were compared with those of pellets attached to different regions of the chin.

Method: Ten healthy talkers served as participants. Three speaking contexts were recorded from each participant: word, sentence, and paragraph. Chin position errors were estimated by computing the standard distance between the mandibular incisor pellet and the chin pellets.

Results: Relative to the underlying mandible, chin pellets moved with an average absolute and relative error of 0.81 mm and 7.30%, respectively. The movements of chin and mandibular pellets were tightly coupled in time.

Conclusion: The chin tracking errors observed in this investigation are considered acceptable for descriptive studies of oromotor behavior, particularly in situations where mandibular placements are not practical (e.g., young children or edentulous adults). The observed amount of error, however, may not be tolerable for fine-grained analyses of mandibular biomechanics. Several guidelines are provided for minimizing error associated with tracking surface landmarks on the chin.

KEY WORDS: jaw motion, speech motor control, skin motion artifact, mandible