HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CEUs available Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nicholas, J. G. Articles by Geers, A. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nicholas, J. G. Articles by Geers, A. E.

Will They Catch Up? The Role of Age at Cochlear Implantation in the Spoken Language Development of Children With Severe to Profound Hearing Loss

Ann E. Geers
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas at Dallas

Contact author: Johanna Grant Nicholas, Central Institute for the Deaf at Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, Box 8115, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63110. E-mail: nicholasj{at}ent.wustl.edu.

Purpose: The authors examined the benefits of younger cochlear implantation, longer cochlear implant use, and greater pre-implant aided hearing to spoken language at 3.5 and 4.5 years of age.

Method: Language samples were obtained at ages 3.5 and 4.5 years from 76 children who received an implant by their 3rd birthday. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to identify characteristics associated with spoken language outcomes at the 2 test ages. The Preschool Language Scale (I. L. Zimmerman, V. G. Steiner, & R. E. Pond, 1992) was used to compare the participants' skills with those of hearing age-mates at age 4.5 years.

Results: Expected language scores increased with younger age at implant and lower pre-implant thresholds, even when compared at the same duration of implant use. Expected Preschool Language Scale scores of the children who received the implant at the youngest ages reached those of hearing age-mates by 4.5 years, but those children implanted after 24 months of age did not catch up with hearing peers.

Conclusion: Children who received a cochlear implant before a substantial delay in spoken language developed (i.e., between 12 and 16 months) were more likely to achieve age-appropriate spoken language. These results favor cochlear implantation before 24 months of age, especially for children with aided pure-tone average thresholds greater than 65 dB prior to surgery.

KEY WORDS: deafness, cochlear implants, pediatrics, audiology, spoken language

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Peters, E. Remmel, and D. Richards Language, Mental State Vocabulary, and False Belief Understanding in Children With Cochlear Implants Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2009; 40(3): 245 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Geers, J. S. Moog, J. Biedenstein, C. Brenner, and H. Hayes Spoken Language Scores of Children Using Cochlear Implants Compared to Hearing Age-Mates at School Entry J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2009; 14(3): 371 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Duchesne, A. Sutton, and F. Bergeron Language Achievement in Children Who Received Cochlear Implants Between 1 and 2 Years of Age: Group Trends and Individual Patterns J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., May 21, 2009; (2009) enp010v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Nicholas and A. E. Geers Expected Test Scores for Preschoolers With a Cochlear Implant Who Use Spoken Language Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2008; 17(2): 121 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Papsin and K. A. Gordon Cochlear Implants for Children with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss N. Engl. J. Med., December 6, 2007; 357(23): 2380 - 2387. [Full Text] [PDF]