JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.50 576-584 June 2007. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/040)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zekveld, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Houtgast, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zekveld, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Houtgast, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Development of the Text Reception Threshold Test: A Visual Analogue of the Speech Reception Threshold Test

Adriana A. Zekveld
Erwin L. J. George
Sophia E. Kramer
S. Theo Goverts
Tammo Houtgast

VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam

Contact author: Adriana A. Zekveld, EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands. E-mail: aa.zekveld{at}vumc.nl.

Purpose: In this study, the authors aimed to develop a visual analogue of the widely used Speech Reception Threshold (SRT; R. Plomp & A. M. Mimpen, 1979b) test. The Text Reception Threshold (TRT) test, in which visually presented sentences are masked by a bar pattern, enables the quantification of modality-aspecific variance in speech-in-noise comprehension to obtain more insight into interindividual differences in this ability.

Method: Using an adaptive procedure similar to the SRT test, the TRT test determines the percentage of unmasked text needed to read 50% of sentences correctly. SRTs in stationary noise (SRTSTAT), modulated noise (SRTMOD), and TRTs were determined for 34 participants with normal hearing, aged 19 to 78 years.

Results: The results indicate that about 30% of the variance in SRTSTAT and SRTMOD is shared with variance in TRT, which reflects the shared involvement of a modality-aspecific cognitive or linguistic ability in forming meaningful wholes of fragments of sentences.

Conclusion: The TRT test, a visual analogue of the SRT test, has been developed to measure the variance in speech-in-noise comprehension associated with modality-aspecific cognitive skills. In future research, normative data of the TRT test should be developed. It would also be interesting to measure TRTs of individuals experiencing difficulties understanding speech.

KEY WORDS: speech perception in noise, SRT test, ability to read masked text, TRT test, modality-aspecific cognitive functions


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
A. A. Zekveld, S. E. Kramer, J. M. Kessens, M. S. M. G. Vlaming, and T. Houtgast
User Evaluation of a Communication System That Automatically Generates Captions to Improve Telephone Communication
Trends in Amplification, March 1, 2009; 13(1): 44 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.