HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goffman, L. Articles by Lucchesi, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goffman, L. Articles by Lucchesi, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Relations Between Segmental and Motor Variability in Prosodically Complex Nonword Sequences

LouAnn Gerken
University of Arizona, Tucson

Julie Lucchesi
Purdue University

Contact author: Lisa Goffman, Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Heavilon Hall, Purdue University, 500 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907. E-mail: goffman{at}purdue.edu.

Purpose: To assess how prosodic prominence and hierarchical foot structure influence segmental and articulatory aspects of speech production, specifically segmental accuracy and variability, and oral movement trajectory variability.

Method: Thirty individuals participated: 10 young adults, 10 children who are normally developing, and 10 children diagnosed with specific language impairment. Segmental error and segmental variability and movement trajectory variability were compared in low and high prosodic prominence conditions (i.e., strong and weak syllables) and in different prosodic foot structures.

Results: Between-participants findings were that both groups of children showed more segmental error and segmental variability and more movement trajectory variability than did adults. A similar within-participant pattern of results was observed for all 3 groups. Prosodic prominence influenced both segmental and motor levels of analysis, with weak syllables produced less accurately and with more lip and jaw movement trajectory variability than strong syllables. However, hierarchical foot structure affected segmental but not motor measures of speech production accuracy and variability.

Conclusions: Motor and segmental variables were not consistently aligned. This pattern of results has clinical implications because inferences about motor variability may not directly follow from observations of segmental variability.

KEY WORDS: prosody, nonword repetition, speech motor control, specific language impairment, variability

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Boliek, T. J. Hixon, P. J. Watson, and P. B. Jones Refinement of Speech Breathing in Healthy 4- to 6-Year-Old Children J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2009; 52(4): 990 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. I. Grigos Changes in Articulator Movement Variability During Phonemic Development: A Longitudinal Study J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2009; 52(1): 164 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]