HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Freedman, S. E. Articles by Robin, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Freedman, S. E. Articles by Robin, D. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Internal Versus External: Oral-Motor Performance as a Function of Attentional Focus

Michael P. Caligiuri
University of California, San Diego

Gabriele Wulf
University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Donald A. Robin
Joint Doctoral Program in Language and Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University and University of California, San Diego, and School of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University

Contact author: Skott E. Freedman, SDSU/UCSD Joint Doctoral Program in Language and Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-1518. E-mail: sfreedman{at}ucsd.edu.

Purpose: Previous studies (e.g., G. Wulf, M. Höß, & W. Prinz, 1998; G. Wulf, B. Lauterbach, & T. Toole, 1999; for a review, see G. Wulf & W. Prinz, 2001) have reported that limb motor performance is enhanced when individuals adopt an external focus (focusing on the effect of the movement) versus an internal focus of attention (focusing on body parts such as the muscles of the hand). This study tested the hypothesis that the effects of attentional focus on limb performance would also occur in the oral-facial system.

Method: Two groups of 23 participants were administered both hand and tongue impulse force control tasks in which each group was randomly assigned either an internal or an external focus of attention. Participants were required to exert rapid pressure bursts to achieve a target force level of 20% of their maximal strength.

Results: Consistent with limb studies, findings revealed a significant advantage of an external focus (greater accuracy, less variability) for both the hand and tongue control tasks, as opposed to an internal focus of attention.

Conclusions: Results are discussed relative to a constrained-action theory of motor control and future application to speech motor learning.

KEY WORDS: oral-motor, constrained action hypothesis, speech motor control, focus of attention

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Maas, D. A. Robin, S. N. Austermann Hula, S. E. Freedman, G. Wulf, K. J. Ballard, and R. A. Schmidt Principles of Motor Learning in Treatment of Motor Speech Disorders Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2008; 17(3): 277 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]