JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.49 1354-1367 December 2006. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/097)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lentz, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lentz, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Marsh, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effect of Hearing Loss on Identification of Asynchronous Double Vowels

Jennifer J. Lentz
Indiana University, Bloomington

Shavon L. Marsh
St. John's University, Jamaica, NY

Contact author: Jennifer J. Lentz, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, 200 S. Jordan Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47405. E-mail: jjlentz{at}indiana.edu.

This study determined whether listeners with hearing loss received reduced benefits due to an onset asynchrony between sounds. Seven normal-hearing listeners and 7 listeners with hearing impairment (HI) were presented with 2 synthetic, steady-state vowels. One vowel (the late-arriving vowel) was 250 ms in duration, and the other (the early-arriving vowel) varied in duration between 350 and 550 ms. The vowels had simultaneous offsets, and therefore an onset asynchrony between the 2 vowels ranged between 100 and 300 ms. The early-arriving and late-arriving vowels also had either the same or different fundamental frequencies. Increases in onset asynchrony and differences in fundamental frequency led to better vowel-identification performance for both groups, with listeners with HI benefiting less from onset asynchrony than normal-hearing listeners. The presence of fundamental frequency differences did not influence the benefit received from onset asynchrony for either group. Excitation pattern modeling indicated that the reduced benefit received from onset asynchrony was not easily predicted by the reduced audibility of the vowel sounds for listeners with HI. Therefore, suprathreshold factors such as loss of the cochlear nonlinearity, reduced temporal integration, and the perception of vowel dominance probably play a greater role in the reduced benefit received from onset asynchrony in listeners with HI.

KEY WORDS: hearing loss, onset asynchrony, vowel identification


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
M. S. Hedrick and S. G. Madix
Effect of Vowel Identity and Onset Asynchrony on Concurrent Vowel Identification
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2009; 52(3): 696 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.