HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Storkel, H. L. Articles by Hogan, T. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Storkel, H. L. Articles by Hogan, T. P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Differentiating Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density in Adult Word Learning

Contact author: Holly Storkel, Department of Speech-Language-Hearing: Sciences and Disorders, University of Kansas, 3001 Dole Human Development Center, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66045-7555. E-mail: hstorkel{at}ku.edu.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to differentiate effects of phonotactic probability, the likelihood of occurrence of a sound sequence, and neighborhood density, the number of words that sound similar to a given word, on adult word learning. A second purpose was to determine what aspect of word learning (viz., triggering learning, formation of an initial representation, or integration with existing representations) was influenced by each variable.

METHOD: Thirty-two adults were exposed to 16 nonwords paired with novel objects in a story context. The nonwords orthogonally varied in phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Learning was measured following 1, 4, and 7 exposures in a picture-naming task. Partially correct (i.e., 2 of 3 phonemes correct) and completely correct responses (i.e., 3 of 3 phonemes correct) were analyzed together and independently to examine emerging and partial representations of new words versus complete and accurate representations of new words.

RESULTS: Analysis of partially correct and completely correct responses combined showed that adults learned a lower proportion of high-probability nonwords than low-probability nonwords (i.e., high-probability disadvantage) and learned a higher proportion of high-density nonwords than low-density nonwords (i.e., high-density advantage). Separate analysis of partially correct responses yielded an effect of phonotactic probability only, whereas analysis of completely correct responses yielded an effect of neighborhood density only.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that phonological and lexical processing influence different aspects of word learning. In particular, phonotactic probability may aid in triggering new learning, whereas neighborhood density may influence the integration of new lexical representations with existing representations.

KEY WORDS: word learning, vocabulary, phonotactic probability, neighborhood density

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. L. Storkel and S. M. Adlof Adult and Child Semantic Neighbors of the Kroll and Potter (1984) Nonobjects J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2009; 52(2): 289 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. L. Storkel and S. M. Adlof The Effect of Semantic Set Size on Word Learning by Preschool Children J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2009; 52(2): 306 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Vitevitch What Can Graph Theory Tell Us About Word Learning and Lexical Retrieval? J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2008; 51(2): 408 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]