JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.49 984-1000 October 2006. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/071)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadley, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hadley, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, J. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Individual Differences in the Onset of Tense Marking: A Growth-Curve Analysis

Pamela A. Hadley
Janet K. Holt

Northern Illinois University, DeKalb

Contact author: Pamela A. Hadley, 618 Joanne Lane, DeKalb, IL 60115. E-mail: phadley{at}niu.edu Department of Communicative Disorders, Northern Illinois University, 323 Wirtz Hall, DeKalb, IL 60115. E-mail: phadley{at}niu.edu

The purpose of this study was to explore individual differences in children's tense onset growth trajectories and to determine whether any within- or between-child predictors could account for these differences. Twenty-two children with expressive vocabulary abilities in the low-average to below-average range participated. Sixteen children were at risk for specific language impairment (SLI), and 6 children had low-average language abilities. Spontaneous language samples, obtained at 3-month intervals between 2;0 and 3;0, were analyzed to examine change in a cumulative productivity score for 5 tense morphemes: third person singular present, past tense, copula BE, auxiliary BE, and auxiliary DO. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to model intercept and linear growth at 30 months and quadratic growth overall. A growth model that included mean length of utterance (MLU) and MLU growth better explained within-child productivity score growth trajectories than a parallel model with vocabulary and vocabulary growth. Significant linear growth in productivity scores remained even after a control for MLU was in place. When between-child predictors were added in the final conditional model, only positive family history approached statistical significance, improving the overall estimation of the model's growth parameters. The findings support theoretical models of language acquisition that claim relative independence of tense marking from other more general aspects of vocabulary development and sentence length. The trends for family history are also consistent with proposals implicating faulty genetic mechanisms underlying developmental language disorders. Systematic use of familial risk data is recommended in future investigations examining the relationship between late-talking children and children at risk for SLI.

KEY WORDS: late-talking children, specific language impairment, tense marking, grammatical development, growth modeling


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
M. L. Rice, L. Hoffman, and K. Wexler
Judgments of Omitted BE and DO in Questions as Extended Finiteness Clinical Markers of Specific Language Impairment (SLI) to 15 Years: A Study of Growth and Asymptote
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2009; 52(6): 1417 - 1433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
M. Rispoli, P. A. Hadley, and J. K. Holt
The Growth of Tense Productivity
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2009; 52(4): 930 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
First LanguageHome page
R. van Veen, J. Evers-Vermeul, T. Sanders, and H. van den Bergh
Parental input and connective acquisition: A growth curve analysis
First Language, August 1, 2009; 29(3): 266 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
E. R. Crais, L. R. Watson, and G. T. Baranek
Use of Gesture Development in Profiling Children's Prelinguistic Communication Skills
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2009; 18(1): 95 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Language Learning and EducationHome page
E. M. Ellis and D. J. Thal
Early Language Delay and Risk for Language Impairment
Language Learning and Education, October 1, 2008; 15(3): 93 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
M. L. Rice, C. L. Taylor, and S. R. Zubrick
Language Outcomes of 7-Year-Old Children With or Without a History of Late Language Emergence at 24 Months
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2008; 51(2): 394 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. R. Zubrick, C. L. Taylor, M. L. Rice, and D. W. Slegers
Late Language Emergence at 24 Months: An Epidemiological Study of Prevalence, Predictors, and Covariates
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2007; 50(6): 1562 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.