Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.49 941-954 October 2006. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/068)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CEUs available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Plante, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Plante, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Factors That Influence Lexical and Semantic Fast Mapping of Young Children With Specific Language Impairment

Mary Alt
Elena Plante

University of Arizona, Tucson

Contact author: Mary Alt, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, P.O. Box 210071, Tucson, AZ 85721-0071. E-mail: malt{at}u.arizona.edu

PURPOSE: This purpose of this study was to investigate the lexical and semantic fast mapping ability of young children with specific language impairment (SLI) and normal language (NL), with a specific emphasis on the influence of phonological factors.

METHOD: The study included 46 children (mean age 58 months), half with SLI and half with NL. Children were asked to fast map visual information only, visual-plus-nonlinguistic-auditory information, and visual-plus-linguistic-auditory information. A mixed design was used to compare children across and within groups.

RESULTS: Children with SLI performed worse than children with NL overall. The SLI group showed specific deficits in semantic fast mapping when they saw visual information only. This condition may have disrupted encoding because it varied from the expected auditory and visual pattern. The children with SLI also performed poorly when they were asked to map phonotactically infrequent linguistic information and when the difficulty of the task increased. A nonword repetition task was correlated with both semantic and lexical fast mapping.

CONCLUSIONS: The findings are discussed in the light of their support for a limited capacity model of processing, as well as the impact of phonology on word learning.

KEY WORDS: semantic, receptive language, specific language impairment (SLI), word learning, phonology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
M. Claessen and S. Leitao
Phonological representations in children with SLI
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, June 1, 2012; 28(2): 211 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
S. A. Wagovich, Y. Pak, and M. D. Miller
Orthographic Word Knowledge Growth in School-Age Children
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2012; 21(2): 140 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. Gray and S. Brinkley
Fast Mapping and Word Learning by Preschoolers With Specific Language Impairment in a Supported Learning Context: Effect of Encoding Cues, Phonotactic Probability, and Object Familiarity
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2011; 54(3): 870 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
M. Velez and R. G. Schwartz
Spoken Word Recognition in School-Age Children With SLI: Semantic, Phonological, and Repetition Priming
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2010; 53(6): 1616 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
E. Mainela-Arnold, J. L. Evans, and J. A. Coady
Explaining Lexical-Semantic Deficits in Specific Language Impairment: The Role of Phonological Similarity, Phonological Working Memory, and Lexical Competition
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2010; 53(6): 1742 - 1756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
J. A. Coady, J. L. Evans, and K. R. Kluender
The Role of Phonotactic Frequency in Sentence Repetition by Children With Specific Language Impairment
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2010; 53(5): 1401 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
P. F. Kan and J. Windsor
Word Learning in Children With Primary Language Impairment: A Meta-Analysis
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2010; 53(3): 739 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. Sheng and K. K. McGregor
Lexical-Semantic Organization in Children With Specific Language Impairment
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2010; 53(1): 146 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
J. A. Wolter and K. Apel
Initial Acquisition of Mental Graphemic Representations in Children with Language Impairment
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2010; 53(1): 179 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. Rvachew and M. Grawburg
Reflections on Phonological Working Memory, Letter Knowledge, and Phonological Awareness: A Reply to Hartmann (2008)
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2008; 51(5): 1219 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
T. J. Spaulding, E. Plante, and R. Vance
Sustained Selective Attention Skills of Preschool Children With Specific Language Impairment: Evidence for Separate Attentional Capacities
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2008; 51(1): 16 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
R. Corrigan
Beyond the Obvious: Constructing Meaning From Subtle Patterns in the Language Environment
Communication Disorders Quarterly, February 1, 2008; 29(2): 109 - 124.
[Abstract] [PDF]