HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tsao, Y.-C. Articles by Iqbal, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tsao, Y.-C. Articles by Iqbal, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Interspeaker Variation in Habitual Speaking Rate: Additional Evidence

Gary Weismer
Waisman Center and Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Wisconsin—Madison

Kamran Iqbal
University of Arkansas at Little Rock

Contact author: Ying-Chiao Tsao, Human Communication Studies/Communicative Disorders, 800 N. State College Boulevard, P.O. Box 6868, California State University—Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92834-6868. E-mail: ytsao{at}fullerton.edu

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis that talkers previously classified by Y.-C. Tsao and G. Weismer (1997) as habitually fast versus habitually slow would show differences in the way they manipulated articulation rate across the rate continuum.

METHOD: Thirty talkers previously classified by Tsao and Weismer (1997) as having habitually slow (n = 15; 7 males, 8 females) and habitually fast (n = 15; 8 males, 7 females) articulation rates produced a single sentence at 7 different rates, using a magnitude production paradigm. Hence, the participants were not randomly assigned to conditions.

RESULTS: Quadratic regression functions relating measured to intended articulation rates were all statistically significant, and most important, there were significant differences between the slow and fast groups in the y intercepts of the functions, for both males and females.

CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a constructive replication of Tsao and Weismer (1997), showing a difference between slow and fast talkers with a new set of speech materials and in a new task. The findings appear to be consistent with a biological basis for intertalker rate differences.

KEY WORDS: interspeaker variation, speaking rate, direct magnitude production, autometric, scaling functions

Abbreviations: 100, = (the reference point) one's habitual rate75, = 25% slower than one's habitual rate50, = twice as slow as one's habitual rate33, = three times slower than one's habitual rate125, = 25% faster than one's habitual rate200, = two times faster than one's habitual rate300, = three times faster than one's habitual rate

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?