JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.49 1037-1057 October 2006. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/074)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peña, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sabel, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peña, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sabel, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dynamic Assessment of School-Age Children's Narrative Ability: An Experimental Investigation of Classification Accuracy

Elizabeth D. Peña
Ronald B. Gillam
Melynn Malek
Roxanna Ruiz-Felter
Maria Resendiz
Christine Fiestas
Tracy Sabel

University of Texas at Austin

Contact author: Elizabeth D. Peña, University of Texas at Austin, 2504-A Whiteside Avenue, Room 7-214, Austin, TX 78712. E-mail: lizp{at}mail.utexas.edu

Two experiments examined reliability and classification accuracy of a narration-based dynamic assessment task.

PURPOSE: The first experiment evaluated whether parallel results were obtained from stories created in response to 2 different wordless picture books. If so, the tasks and measures would be appropriate for assessing pretest and posttest change within a dynamic assessment format. The second experiment evaluated the extent to which children with language impairments performed differently than typically developing controls on dynamic assessment of narrative language.

METHOD: In the first experiment, 58 1st- and 2nd-grade children told 2 stories about wordless picture books. Stories were rated on macrostructural and microstructural aspects of language form and content, and the ratings were subjected to reliability analyses. In the second experiment, 71 children participated in dynamic assessment. There were 3 phases: a pretest phase, in which children created a story that corresponded to 1 of the wordless picture books from Experiment 1; a teaching phase, in which children attended 2 short mediation sessions that focused on storytelling ability; and a posttest phase, in which children created a story that corresponded to a second wordless picture book from Experiment 1. Analyses compared the pretest and posttest stories that were told by 2 groups of children who received mediated learning (typical and language impaired groups) and a no-treatment control group of typically developing children from Experiment 1.

RESULTS: The results of the first experiment indicated that the narrative measures applied to stories about 2 different wordless picture books had good internal consistency. In Experiment 2, typically developing children who received mediated learning demonstrated a greater amount of pretest to posttest change than children in the language impaired and control groups. Classification analysis indicated better specificity and sensitivity values for measures of response to intervention (modifiability) and posttest storytelling than for measures of pretest storytelling. Observation of modifiability was the single best indicator of language impairment. Posttest measures and modifiability together yielded no misclassifications.

CONCLUSION: The first experiment supported the use of 2 wordless picture books as stimulus materials for collecting narratives before and after mediation within a dynamic assessment paradigm. The second experiment supported the use of dynamic assessment for accurately identifying language impairments in school-age children.

KEY WORDS: assessment, bias, multicultural, narratives, children


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LSHSSHome page
L. M. Hoffman
The Utility of School-Age Narrative Microstructure Indices: INMIS and the Proportion of Restricted Utterances
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, October 1, 2009; 40(4): 365 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
K. J. Greenslade, E. Plante, and R. Vance
The Diagnostic Accuracy and Construct Validity of the Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test--Preschool: Second Edition
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 150 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
H. W. Catts
The Narrow View of Reading Promotes a Broad View of Comprehension
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 178 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
J. B. Oetting, L. H. Cleveland, and R. F. Cope III
Empirically Derived Combinations of Tools and Clinical Cutoffs: An Illustrative Case With a Sample of Culturally/Linguistically Diverse Children
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 44 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.