JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.49 1001-1021 October 2006. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/072)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marinellie, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, Y.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marinellie, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, Y.-L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effect of Word Frequency on Noun and Verb Definitions: A Developmental Study

Sally A. Marinellie
Yen-Ling Chan

Ohio University, Athens

Contact author: Sally A. Marinellie, School of Hearing, Speech and Language Sciences, Ohio University, Grover Center W 240, Athens, OH 45701. E-mail: marinels{at}ohio.edu

PURPOSE: Word frequency has profound effects in word recognition and production tasks. Here the influence of word frequency on definitions was investigated, and it was hypothesized that word frequency would have significant influence on responses provided for definitions of nouns and verbs.

METHOD: Students from Grades 4, 7, 10, and college wrote definitions for high- and low-frequency nouns and verbs and rated their familiarity with the stimulus words. In the noun study, definitions were coded with the semantic response categories "use/purpose," "description," "association/relation," "partial explanation," "explanation," and "error." "Partial explanation" and "explanation" responses were subcategorized to code for use of critical attributes of meaning and class terms. In the verb study, definitions were coded for "synonym," "association/relation," "class," "partial explanation," "explanation," and "error."

RESULTS: Results indicated that certain response categories (such as a class term or a critical attribute) were more characteristic in definitions of high- compared with low-frequency words, whereas responses (such as nonspecific class) were more characteristic in low- compared with high-frequency words. In addition, certain response categories increased with age (such as use of class terms and critical attributes), while errors decreased with age. Familiarity ratings served to validate the high- and low- frequency nature of the stimulus words.

CONCLUSIONS: In general, word frequency had a significant impact on word definitions. Implications are discussed with respect to word familiarity, representation in the mental lexicon, acquisition of word meaning, and shared linguistic knowledge.

KEY WORDS: development, word definition, word frequency, familiarity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
S. A. Marinellie
The content of children's definitions: The oral-written distinction
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, February 1, 2009; 25(1): 89 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.