HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lidestam, B. Articles by Beskow, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lidestam, B. Articles by Beskow, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Visual Phonemic Ambiguity and Speechreading

Jonas Beskow
Centre for Speech Technology, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden

Contact author: Björn Lidestam, Department of Behavioural Sciences, Linköping University SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden. E-mail: bjli{at}ibv.liu.se

PURPOSE: To study the role of visual perception of phonemes in visual perception of sentences and words among normal-hearing individuals.

METHOD: Twenty-four normal-hearing adults identified consonants, words, and sentences, spoken by either a human or a synthetic talker. The synthetic talker was programmed with identical parameters within phoneme groups, hypothetically resulting in simplified articulation. Proportions of correctly identified phonemes per participant, condition, and task, as well as sensitivity to single consonants and clusters of consonants, were measured. Groups of mutually exclusive consonants were used for sensitivity analyses and hierarchical cluster analyses.

RESULTS: Consonant identification performance did not differ as a function of talker, nor did average sensitivity to single consonants. The bilabial and labiodental clusters were most readily identified and cohesive for both talkers. Word and sentence identification was better for the human talker than the synthetic talker. The participants were more sensitive to the clusters of the least visible consonants with the human talker than with the synthetic talker.

CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that ability to distiguish between clusters of the least visually distinct phonemes is important in speechreading. Specifically, it reduces the number of candidates, and thereby facilitates lexical identification.

KEY WORDS: speechreading, articulation, students, normal hearing

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. K. Keintz, K. Bunton, and J. D. Hoit Influence of Visual Information on the Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2007; 16(3): 222 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]