HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Plyler, P. N. Articles by Fleck, E. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Plyler, P. N. Articles by Fleck, E. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effects of High-Frequency Amplification on the Objective and Subjective Performance of Hearing Instrument Users With Varying Degrees of High-Frequency Hearing Loss

Erica L. Fleck
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge

Contact author: Patrick N. Plyler, Department of Audiology & Speech Pathology, University of Tennessee, 578 South Stadium Hall, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-0740. Email: pplyler{at}utk.edu

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to determine if amplifying beyond 2 kHz affected the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of mild-to-severe high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

METHOD: Twenty participants were fitted binaurally with digital completely-in-the-canal devices with 4-channel wide dynamic range compression (Starkey Axent). Each participant used the hearing instruments for two 6-week trial periods. Each hearing instrument was programmed to maximize high-frequency audibility during 1 trial period and minimize high-frequency audibility during the other trial period. Objective evaluations were conducted in quiet using the Connected Speech Test (CST) and in noise using the CST and the Hearing in Noise Test. Subjective performance was evaluated by administering the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit and a questionnaire.

RESULTS: Results indicated that high-frequency amplification significantly improved objective performance in noise and subjective preference in quiet for listeners with varying degrees of mild-to-severe high-frequency hearing loss. Results also suggested that high-frequency amplification may affect subjective preference in noise and overall for listeners with varying degrees of mild-to-severe high-frequency hearing loss when feedback is eliminated.

CONCLUSION: Based on these significant benefits, dispensers should be aware that high-frequency amplification should, at least initially, be provided to the affected high-frequency regions when mild-to-severe hearing loss is present.

KEY WORDS: hearing aids, high-frequency, amplification

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. Roup and C. M. Noe Hearing Aid Outcomes for Listeners With High-Frequency Hearing Loss Am J Audiol, June 1, 2009; 18(1): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Horwitz, J. B. Ahlstrom, and J. R. Dubno Factors Affecting the Benefits of High-Frequency Amplification J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2008; 51(3): 798 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. N. Plyler, S. G. Madix, J. W. Thelin, and K. W. Johnston Contribution of High-Frequency Information to the Acceptance of Background Noise in Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing Am J Audiol, December 1, 2007; 16(2): 149 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Gifford, M. F. Dorman, A. J. Spahr, and S. A. McKarns Effect of Digital Frequency Compression (DFC) on Speech Recognition in Candidates for Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2007; 50(5): 1194 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]