JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.49 395-411 April 2006. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/031)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Duffy, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Duffy, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Parametric Quantitative Acoustic Analysis of Conversation Produced by Speakers With Dysarthria and Healthy Speakers

Kristin M. Rosen
Raymond D. Kent
Amy L. Delaney

Waisman Research Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison

Joseph R. Duffy
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Contact author: Kristin Rosen, 1500 Highland Avenue, Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705. Email: rosen{at}waisman.wisc.edu

PURPOSE: This study's main purpose was to (a) identify acoustic signatures of hypokinetic dysarthria (HKD) that are robust to phonetic variation in conversational speech and (b) determine specific characteristics of the variability associated with HKD.

METHOD: Twenty healthy control (HC) participants and 20 participants with HKD associated with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) repeated 3 isolated sentences (controlled phonetic content) and 2 min of conversational speech (phonetic content treated as a random variable). A MATLAB-based program automatically calculated measures of contrastivity: speech–pause ratio, intensity variation, median and maximum formant slope, formant range, change in the upper and lower spectral envelope, and range of the spectral envelope. t tests were used to identify which measures were sensitive to HKD and which measures differed by task. Discriminant analysis was used to identify the combination of measures that best predicted HKD, and this analysis was then used as a general measure of contrastivity (Contrastivity Index). Differential effects of HKD on maximum and typical contrastivity levels were tested with interaction of maximum, minimum, and median observations of individual speakers and with pairwise comparisons of skewness and kurtosis of the contrastivity index distributions.

RESULTS: Group differences were detected with pairwise comparisons with t tests in 8 of the 9 measures. Percentage pause time and spectral range were identified as the most specific (95%) and accurate (95%) differentiators of HKD and HC conversational speech. Sentence repetition elicited significantly higher levels of contrastivity than conversational speech in both HC and HKD speakers. Maximum and minimum contrastivities were significantly lower in HKD speech, but there was no evidence that HKD affects maximum contrastivity levels more than median contrastivity levels. The HKD speakers' contrastivity distributions were significantly more skewed to lower levels of production.

CONCLUSION: HKD can be consistently distinguished from HC speech in both sentence repetition and conversational speech on the basis of intensity variation and spectral range. Although speakers with HKD were effectively able to produce higher contrastivity levels in sentence repetition tasks, they habitually performed closer to the lower end of their production ranges.

KEY WORDS: acoustic, dysarthria, conversation, stability, distributional analysis, Parkinson's disease


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
A. T. Neel
Effects of Loud and Amplified Speech on Sentence and Word Intelligibility in Parkinson Disease
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2009; 52(4): 1021 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
S. Narayana, A. Jacks, D. A. Robin, H. Poizner, W. Zhang, C. Franklin, M. Liotti, D. Vogel, and P. T. Fox
A Noninvasive Imaging Approach to Understanding Speech Changes Following Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2009; 18(2): 146 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
K. Bunton, R. D. Kent, J. R. Duffy, J. C. Rosenbek, and J. F. Kent
Listener Agreement for Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Dysarthria
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2007; 50(6): 1481 - 1495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. Sapir, J. L. Spielman, L. O. Ramig, B. H. Story, and C. Fox
Effects of Intensive Voice Treatment (the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment [LSVT]) on Vowel Articulation in Dysarthric Individuals With Idiopathic Parkinson Disease: Acoustic and Perceptual Findings
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2007; 50(4): 899 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.