HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zeng, F.-G. Articles by Liu, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zeng, F.-G. Articles by Liu, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Speech Perception in Individuals With Auditory Neuropathy

Contact author: Fan-Gang Zeng, 364 Med Surge II, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697. Email: fzeng{at}uci.edu

PURPOSE: Speech perception in participants with auditory neuropathy (AN) was systematically studied to answer the following 2 questions: Does noise present a particular problem for people with AN? Can clear speech and cochlear implants alleviate this problem?

METHOD: The researchers evaluated the advantage in intelligibility of clear speech over conversational speech in 13 participants with AN. Of these participants, 7 had received a cochlear implant. Eight sentence-recognition experiments were conducted to examine the clear speech advantage in 2 listening conditions (quiet and noise) using 4 stimulation modes (monaural acoustic, diotic acoustic, monaural electric, and binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation).

RESULTS: Participants with AN performed more poorly in speech recognition in noise than did the normal-hearing, cochlear-impaired, and cochlear implant controls. A significant clear speech advantage was observed, ranging from 9 to 23 percentage points in intelligibility for all listening conditions and stimulation modes. Electric stimulation via a cochlear implant produced significantly higher intelligibility than acoustic stimulation in both quiet and in noise. Binaural hearing with either diotic acoustic stimulation or combined acoustic and electric stimulation produced significantly higher intelligibility than monaural stimulation in quiet but not in noise.

CONCLUSIONS: Participants with AN most likely derive the clear speech advantage from enhanced temporal properties in clear speech and improved neural synchrony with electric stimulation. Although the present result supports cochlear implantation as one treatment choice for people with AN, it suggests that the use of innovative hearing aids may be another viable option to improve speech perception in noise.

KEY WORDS: auditory neuropathy, binaural hearing, clear speech, cochlear implant, speech perception

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Leigh, G. Rance, S. Dettman, and R. Dowell Cochlear Implant Outcomes for Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder Hearing and Hearing Disorders in Childhood, September 1, 2009; 19(2): 75 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Phillips, S. J. Richter, and D. McPherson Voiced Initial Consonant Perception Deficits in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss and Good and Poor Word Recognition J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2009; 52(1): 118 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]