|
|
||||||||
Waisman Center, University of WisconsinMadison
Contact author: Hugh W. Catts, Department of Speech, Language, Hearing, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045. Email: catts{at}ku.edu
PURPOSE: To examine concurrently and retrospectively the language abilities of children with specific reading comprehension deficits ("poor comprehenders") and compare them to typical readers and children with specific decoding deficits ("poor decoders").
METHOD: In Study 1, the authors identified 57 poor comprehenders, 27 poor decoders, and 98 typical readers on the basis of 8th-grade reading achievement. These subgroups' performances on 8th-grade measures of language comprehension and phonological processing were investigated. In Study 2, the authors examined retrospectively subgroups' performances on measures of language comprehension and phonological processing in kindergarten, 2nd, and 4th grades. Word recognition and reading comprehension in 2nd and 4th grades were also considered.
RESULTS: Study 1 showed that poor comprehenders had concurrent deficits in language comprehension but normal abilities in phonological processing. Poor decoders were characterized by the opposite pattern of language abilities. Study 2 results showed that subgroups had language (and word recognition) profiles in the earlier grades that were consistent with those observed in 8th grade. Subgroup differences in reading comprehension were inconsistent across grades but reflective of the changes in the components of reading comprehension over time.
CONCLUSIONS: The results support the simple view of reading and the phonological deficit hypothesis. Furthermore, the findings indicate that a classification system that is based on the simple view has advantages over standard systems that focus only on word recognition and/or reading comprehension.
KEY WORDS: poor comprehenders, specific reading comprehension deficit, simple view of reading, phonological processing, language comprehension deficits
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Aouad and R. Savage The Component Structure of Preliteracy Skills: Further Evidence for the Simple View of Reading Canadian Journal of School Psychology, June 1, 2009; 24(2): 183 - 200. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. W. Catts The Narrow View of Reading Promotes a Broad View of Comprehension Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 178 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Scott A Case for the Sentence in Reading Comprehension Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 184 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Cain and A. S. Towse To Get Hold of the Wrong End of the Stick: Reasons for Poor Idiom Understanding in Children With Reading Comprehension Difficulties J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2008; 51(6): 1538 - 1549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. W. Catts, M. S. Bridges, T. D. Little, and J. B. Tomblin Reading Achievement Growth in Children With Language Impairments J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2008; 51(6): 1569 - 1579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lanter and L. R. Watson Promoting Literacy in Students With ASD: The Basics for the SLP Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 33 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Hadley and J. K. Holt Individual differences in the onset of tense marking: a growth-curve analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2006; 49(5): 984 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASHA Journals | AJA | AJSLP | JSLHR | LSHSS |