JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.49 278-293 April 2006. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Catts, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Weismer, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Catts, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Weismer, S. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Language Deficits in Poor Comprehenders: A Case for the Simple View of Reading

Hugh W. Catts
Suzanne M. Adlof

University of Kansas, Lawrence

Susan Ellis Weismer
Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison

Contact author: Hugh W. Catts, Department of Speech, Language, Hearing, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045. Email: catts{at}ku.edu

PURPOSE: To examine concurrently and retrospectively the language abilities of children with specific reading comprehension deficits ("poor comprehenders") and compare them to typical readers and children with specific decoding deficits ("poor decoders").

METHOD: In Study 1, the authors identified 57 poor comprehenders, 27 poor decoders, and 98 typical readers on the basis of 8th-grade reading achievement. These subgroups' performances on 8th-grade measures of language comprehension and phonological processing were investigated. In Study 2, the authors examined retrospectively subgroups' performances on measures of language comprehension and phonological processing in kindergarten, 2nd, and 4th grades. Word recognition and reading comprehension in 2nd and 4th grades were also considered.

RESULTS: Study 1 showed that poor comprehenders had concurrent deficits in language comprehension but normal abilities in phonological processing. Poor decoders were characterized by the opposite pattern of language abilities. Study 2 results showed that subgroups had language (and word recognition) profiles in the earlier grades that were consistent with those observed in 8th grade. Subgroup differences in reading comprehension were inconsistent across grades but reflective of the changes in the components of reading comprehension over time.

CONCLUSIONS: The results support the simple view of reading and the phonological deficit hypothesis. Furthermore, the findings indicate that a classification system that is based on the simple view has advantages over standard systems that focus only on word recognition and/or reading comprehension.

KEY WORDS: poor comprehenders, specific reading comprehension deficit, simple view of reading, phonological processing, language comprehension deficits


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian Journal of School PsychologyHome page
J. Aouad and R. Savage
The Component Structure of Preliteracy Skills: Further Evidence for the Simple View of Reading
Canadian Journal of School Psychology, June 1, 2009; 24(2): 183 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
H. W. Catts
The Narrow View of Reading Promotes a Broad View of Comprehension
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 178 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
C. M. Scott
A Case for the Sentence in Reading Comprehension
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 184 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
K. Cain and A. S. Towse
To Get Hold of the Wrong End of the Stick: Reasons for Poor Idiom Understanding in Children With Reading Comprehension Difficulties
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2008; 51(6): 1538 - 1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
H. W. Catts, M. S. Bridges, T. D. Little, and J. B. Tomblin
Reading Achievement Growth in Children With Language Impairments
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2008; 51(6): 1569 - 1579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
E. Lanter and L. R. Watson
Promoting Literacy in Students With ASD: The Basics for the SLP
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 33 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
P. A. Hadley and J. K. Holt
Individual differences in the onset of tense marking: a growth-curve analysis.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2006; 49(5): 984 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.