HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Westerlund, M. Articles by Eriksson, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Westerlund, M. Articles by Eriksson, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Can Severely Language Delayed 3-Year-Olds Be Identified at 18 Months? Evaluation of a Screening Version of the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories

Eva Berglund
Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Mårten Eriksson
University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden

Contact author: Monica Westerlund, Central Unit of Child Health Care, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Unit of Pediatrics, Uppsala University Hospital S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. Email: monica.westerlund{at}akademiska.se

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a screening instrument (the Swedish Communication Screening at 18 months of age; SCS18), derived from the Swedish MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventory, in identification of 18-month-old children who will be severely language disabled by 3 years of age, the authors (a) analyzed which SCS18's component yielded the best prediction, (b) compared the productivity figures of the SCS18 with those of the traditional method of identification, and (c) tried different cutoff criteria of the SCS18.

METHOD: Half of the child health care (CHC) centers in a Swedish county were randomly selected to use the SCS18 (e.g., a checklist supporting parents in assessing their child's word production, word comprehension, and communicative gestures). Remaining CHC centers used an informal assessment. Expressive and receptive language was subsequently judged with an observation for 3-year-olds that is routine in the county. An unselected population of 2,080 children participated at 18 months of age and again at 3 years of age.

RESULT: Number of spoken words yielded the best prediction, and SCS18 was superior to the traditional method. A sensitivity of 50%, however, was not enough, and a stricter criterion resulted in too many false positives to be acceptable as routine.

CONCLUSION: Although the SCS18 has strength, the age of 18 months seems to be too early for identification of severe language disability.

KEY WORDS: early language screening, parental report, language delay, CDI, child health care

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?