JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.48 1269-1279 December 2005. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/088)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karnell, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Rogus, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karnell, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Rogus, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparison of Clinician Judgments and Measurements of Swallow Response Time

A Preliminary Report

Michael P. Karnell 1
Nicole M. Rogus 2

1 University of Iowa, Iowa City
2 Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

michael-karnell{at}uiowa.edu

Practicing clinicians frequently offer judgments about aspects of swallowing physiology rather than performing actual measurements. Little is known about the accuracy of those judgments. The purpose of this preliminary study was to explore agreement of clinicians' judgments of pharyngeal swallow response time (PSRT) with temporal measurements of PSRT. In preparation for a larger study, PSRT was measured from the first 3 ml liquid bolus swallow that appeared in each of 20 videofluorographic swallowing evaluations. The same 20 swallows were then shown to 3 clinicians who were instructed to subjectively rate PSRT. The reliability of the PSRT measurements was strong (r > .95). Intrajudge and interjudge agreement was better than chance in all but 1 interjudge comparison. Percentage agreement between clinicians' judgments and the measurements, when the measurements were categorized as either not delayed or delayed, ranged from 60% to 95%. Chi-square and Phi statistics comparing the outcomes of clinicians' ratings with the measurement outcomes were significant, supporting the agreement of the judgments with the measurements. Although the results of tests of agreement were found to be acceptable, clinician experience and training remain important issues whenever clinical judgments are involved. Larger studies are needed to establish the accuracy and importance of clinicians' judgments of PSRT and observations of swallowing physiology.

KEY WORDS: dysphagia, pharyngeal swallow response time, clinical judgments, videofluorography

Submitted on September 27, 2004
Revised on February 17, 2005
Accepted on April 13, 2005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
First LanguageHome page
H. L. Balog and D. Brentari
The relationship between early gestures and intonation
First Language, May 1, 2008; 28(2): 141 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.