JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.46 1029-1037 October 2003. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/082)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conti-Ramsden, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Conti-Ramsden, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Processing and Linguistic Markers in Young Children With Specific Language Impairment (SLI)

Gina Conti-Ramsden 1
1 University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

gina.conti-ramsden{at}man.ac.uk

Thirty-two 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 32 chronological age (CA) controls completed 4 tasks that were considered potential positive markers for SLI. Children's performance on 2 linguistic tasks (past tense and noun plurals task) and 2 processing tasks (nonword repetition and digit recall) were examined. This approach allowed the examination of more than 1 type of marker simultaneously, facilitating both comparisons between markers and also the evaluation of combinations of markers in relation to identifying SLI. Children with SLI performed significantly worse than CA controls in all 4 marker tasks. Specificity/sensitivity analysis of the 4 marker tasks revealed nonword repetition and the past tense task to have the best overall accuracy at the 25th and 16th percentile. Finally, stepwise discriminant analysis revealed nonword repetition and past tense marking to be the best markers for identifying young children with SLI.

KEY WORDS: specific language impairment (SLI), processing markers, linguistic markers, nonword repetition

Submitted on May 8, 2002
Accepted on February 6, 2003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. M. D. Archibald and M. F. Joanisse
On the Sensitivity and Specificity of Nonword Repetition and Sentence Recall to Language and Memory Impairments in Children
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2009; 52(4): 899 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
A. Lukacs, L. B. Leonard, B. Kas, and C. Pleh
The Use of Tense and Agreement by Hungarian-Speaking Children With Language Impairment
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2009; 52(1): 98 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
J. B. Oetting, L. H. Cleveland, and R. F. Cope III
Empirically Derived Combinations of Tools and Clinical Cutoffs: An Illustrative Case With a Sample of Culturally/Linguistically Diverse Children
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 44 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
J. S. Gorin
Reconsidering Issues in Validity Theory
Educational Researcher, November 1, 2007; 36(8): 456 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
K. Proctor-Williams and M. E. Fey
Recast Density and Acquisition of Novel Irregular Past Tense Verbs
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2007; 50(4): 1029 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
K. Graf Estes, J. L. Evans, and N. M. Else-Quest
Differences in the Nonword Repetition Performance of Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment: A Meta-Analysis
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2007; 50(1): 177 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. M. D. Archibald and S. E. Gathercole
Nonword repetition: a comparison of tests.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2006; 49(5): 970 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
P. A. Hadley and J. K. Holt
Individual differences in the onset of tense marking: a growth-curve analysis.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2006; 49(5): 984 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
E. D. Pena, R. B. Gillam, M. Malek, R. Ruiz-Felter, M. Resendiz, C. Fiestas, and T. Sabel
Dynamic Assessment of School-Age Children's Narrative Ability: An Experimental Investigation of Classification Accuracy.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2006; 49(5): 1037 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. F. Stokes, A. M-Y. Wong, P. Fletcher, and L. B. Leonard
Nonword repetition and sentence repetition as clinical markers of specific language impairment: the case of cantonese.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2006; 49(2): 219 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.