JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.46 711-717 June 2003. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/056)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Brian, N.
Right arrow Articles by Onslow, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Brian, N.
Right arrow Articles by Onslow, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Generalizability Theory I

Assessing Reliability of Observational Data in the Communication Sciences

Nigel O'Brian 1
Sue O'Brian 1
Ann Packman 1

Mark Onslow 1
1 The University of Sydney Australia

nigel{at}maths.usyd.edu.au

Perceptual rating scales can be valid, reliable, and convenient tools for evaluating speech outcomes in research and clinical practice. However, they depend on the perceptions of observers. Too few raters may compromise accuracy, whereas too many would be inefficient. There is therefore a need to determine the minimum number of raters required for a reliable result. In this context, the ideas of Generalizability Theory have become increasingly popular in the behavioral sciences; suggestions have been made for their application to the assessment of speech-language disorders. Here we review the concepts involved, which are applied in a companion article dealing with speech naturalness data obtained from clients who recently completed treatment for their stuttering. We pay particular attention to the statistical requirements of the theory, including some cautions about possible inappropriate use of these techniques. We also offer a new interpretation of the results of the analysis that aims to be more meaningful to most speech-language pathologists.

KEY WORDS: stuttering, generalizability theory, perceptual rating scales, analysis of variance

Submitted on August 19, 2002
Accepted on December 11, 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 First LanguageHome page
H. L. Balog and D. Brentari
The relationship between early gestures and intonation
First Language, May 1, 2008; 28(2): 141 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JSLHRHome page
E. W. Healy and A. A. Montgomery
Consistency of Sentence Intelligibility Across Difficult Listening Situations.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2006; 49(4): 823 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Early InterventionHome page
C. T. Bruckner, P. J. Yoder, and R.A. McWilliam
Generalizability and Decision Studies: An Example Using Conversational Language Samples
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 2006; 28(2): 139 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.