The Role of Syntactic Complexity in Treatment of Sentence Deficits in Agrammatic Aphasia

The Complexity Account of Treatment Efficacy (CATE)

ckthom{at}northwestern.edu

This experiment examined the hypothesis that training production of syntactically complex sentences results in generalization to less complex sentences that have processes in common with treated structures. Using a single subject experimental design, 4 individuals with agrammatic aphasia were trained to comprehend and produce filler-gap sentences with wh-movement, including, from least to most complex, object-extracted who-questions, object clefts, and sentences with objectrelative clausal embedding. Two participants received treatment first on the least complex structure (who-questions), and 2 received treatment first on the most complex form (object-relative constructions), while untrained sentences and narrative language samples were tested for generalization. When generalization did not occur across structures, each was successively entered into treatment. Results showed no generalization across sentence types when who-questions were trained; however, as predicted, object-relative training resulted in robust generalization to both object clefts and who-questions. These findings support those derived from previous work, indicating not only that generalization occurs across structures that are linguistically related, but also that generalization is enhanced when the direction of treatment is from more complex to less complex constructions. This latter finding supports the authors' newly coined "complexity account of treatment efficacy" (CATE).

KEY WORDS: agrammatism, aphasia, sentence production, treatment, generalization

Submitted on August 24, 2002
Accepted on January 9, 2003

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Weintraub, M.-M. Mesulam, C. Wieneke, A. Rademaker, E. J. Rogalski, and C. K. Thompson The Northwestern Anagram Test: Measuring Sentence Production in Primary Progressive Aphasia American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, October 1, 2009; 24(5): 408 - 416. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Levy and N. Friedmann Treatment of syntactic movement in syntactic SLI: A case study First Language, February 1, 2009; 29(1): 15 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Kiran Typicality of Inanimate Category Exemplars in Aphasia Treatment: Further Evidence for Semantic Complexity J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2008; 51(6): 1550 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Maas, D. A. Robin, S. N. Austermann Hula, S. E. Freedman, G. Wulf, K. J. Ballard, and R. A. Schmidt Principles of Motor Learning in Treatment of Motor Speech Disorders Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2008; 17(3): 277 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. K. Thompson Complexity in Language Learning and Treatment Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 3 - 5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kiran Complexity in the Treatment of Naming Deficits Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 18 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. K. Thompson and L. P. Shapiro Complexity in Treatment of Syntactic Deficits Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 30 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]