JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.46 422-436 April 2003. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/035)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milbrath, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, N. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milbrath, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, N. P.

Do Vocal Warm-Up Exercises Alleviate Vocal Fatigue?

Rochelle L. Milbrath 1
Nancy Pearl Solomon 1

1 University of Minnesota Minneapolis

nancy.solomon{at}na.amedd.army.mil

Vocal warm-up (WU) exercises of varying types and durations have been suggested as a way of improving vocal function. However, limited research has been conducted to assess the effects of vocal WU exercises on normal or disordered voices. This study attempted to manipulate vocal function, assessed by phonation threshold pressure (PTP) and self-perceived phonatory effort (PPE) at 3 pitches, in 8 young women who reported symptoms of chronic vocal fatigue. Predictions were that PTP and PPE would decrease after 20 min of vocal WU exercises, increase after 1 hr of loud reading, and decrease after 30 min of vocal silence. Furthermore, greater increases in PTP and PPE were expected when the loud-reading task was preceded by a placebo condition of vocal rest than by vocal WU exercises. Results failed to reveal statistically significant changes in PTP or PPE after any of the experimental tasks. High between-subject variability contributed to this result. Removal of 1 outlier from the sample resulted in a statistically significant difference for PTP across tasks, although post hoc pairwise comparisons failed to detect specific effects. Informal inspection of the data indicated that the most obvious difference was an increase in PTP after the loud-reading task at the highest pitch.

KEY WORDS: vocal fatigue, warm-up exercises, phonation threshold pressure, effort

Submitted on July 1, 2002
Accepted on October 8, 2002




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LSHSSHome page
G. L. Lof and M. M. Watson
A Nationwide Survey of Nonspeech Oral Motor Exercise Use: Implications for Evidence-Based Practice
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 392 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
K. Tanner, N. Roy, R. M. Merrill, and M. Elstad
The Effects of Three Nebulized Osmotic Agents in the Dry Larynx
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2007; 50(3): 635 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.