Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.46 261-272 April 2003. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/021)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choudhury, N.
Right arrow Articles by Benasich, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choudhury, N.
Right arrow Articles by Benasich, A. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Family Aggregation Study

The Influence of Family History and Other Risk Factors on Language Development

Naseem Choudhury 1
April Ann Benasich 1

1 Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark

naseem{at}axon.rutgers.edu

Substantial evidence continues to accrue for familial transmission of specific language impairment (SLI). The incidence in families with a history of SLI is estimated at approximately 20%–40%, whereas in the general population the estimated incidence is about 4%. Typical aggregation studies compare data on the speech and language status of parents and siblings of individuals with SLI (the probands) to similar data from family members of control individuals with no speech or language disorder history. In the present study, family aggregation of SLI was examined for a unique sample of children who were ascertained before 6 months of age and thus did not have SLI, but were born into a family with a positive history of SLI (FH+). No study to date has examined the pattern of affectance in families of children ascertained at such a young age. In addition, the ratio of boys to girls born into such families was investigated, as previous studies have suggested alterations in the expected gender ratios. Consistent with prior research, SLI was found to aggregate in families; the average affectance rate in FH+ families was 32%, with significantly more boys (41%) reported as having SLI than girls (16%). A comparison of FH+ and control families (FH–) on sociodemographic factors and medical history revealed differences in the overall rate of autoimmune diseases; FH+ families reported a significantly higher incidence (35%) compared to FH– families (9%). Finally, the 3- year language abilities of a subset of 32 children from FH+ families were compared with those of 60 children from FH– families. Children from FH+ families scored significantly lower on standardized measures of language and were more likely to fall below the 16th percentile (28%) than children from FH– families (7%). These results provide converging evidence that children from FH+ families are indeed at greater risk of developing language delay compared to children from control families.

KEY WORDS: specific language impairment, language, aggregation, learning impairments

Submitted on February 7, 2002
Accepted on August 13, 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
School-Based IssuesHome page
J. W. Garrett
Understanding and Applying Genetics Knowledge in the Schools
School-Based Issues, August 1, 2012; 13(2): 27 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
A. J. O. Whitehouse
Is There a Sex Ratio Difference in the Familial Aggregation of Specific Language Impairment? A Meta-Analysis
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2010; 53(4): 1015 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. J. Harrison and S. McLeod
Risk and Protective Factors Associated With Speech and Language Impairment in a Nationally Representative Sample of 4- to 5-Year-Old Children
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2010; 53(2): 508 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Language and SpeechHome page
E. L. Bavin, D. B. Grayden, K. Scott, and T. Stefanakis
Testing auditory processing skills and their associations with language in 4-5-year-olds.
Language and Speech, January 1, 2010; 53(Pt 1): 31 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
J. F. Flax, T. Realpe-Bonilla, C. Roesler, N. Choudhury, and A. Benasich
Using Early Standardized Language Measures to Predict Later Language and Early Reading Outcomes in Children at High Risk for Language-Learning Impairments
J Learn Disabil, January 1, 2009; 42(1): 61 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
T. P. Alloway and L. Archibald
Working Memory and Learning in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder and Specific Language Impairment
J Learn Disabil, June 1, 2008; 41(3): 251 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
G. Conti-Ramsden, N. Botting, and K. Durkin
Parental Perspectives During the Transition to Adulthood of Adolescents With a History of Specific Language Impairment (SLI)
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2008; 51(1): 84 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X. Zhou and M. M. Merzenich
Intensive training in adults refines A1 representations degraded in an early postnatal critical period
PNAS, October 2, 2007; 104(40): 15935 - 15940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
B. Prathanee, B. Thinkhamrop, and S. Dechongkit
Factors Associated With Specific Language Impairment and Later Language Development During Early Life: A Literature Review
Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 2007; 46(1): 22 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. S. DeThorne, S. A. Hart, S. A. Petrill, K. Deater-Deckard, L. A. Thompson, C. Schatschneider, and M. D. Davison
Children's History of Speech-Language Difficulties: Genetic Influences and Associations With Reading-Related Measures
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2006; 49(6): 1280 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
P. A. Hadley and J. K. Holt
Individual Differences in the Onset of Tense Marking: A Growth-Curve Analysis
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2006; 49(5): 984 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
G. Conti-Ramsden, Z. Simkin, and A. Pickles
Estimating Familial Loading in SLI: A Comparison of Direct Assessment Versus Parental Interview.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2006; 49(1): 88 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
H. D. Nelson, P. Nygren, M. Walker, and R. Panoscha
Screening for Speech and Language Delay in Preschool Children: Systematic Evidence Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
Pediatrics, February 1, 2006; 117(2): e298 - e319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]