Spectral Contributions to the Benefit From Spatial Separation of Speech and Noise

dubnojr{at}musc.edu

Speech recognition in noise improves when speech and noise sources are separated in space. This benefit has two components whose effects are strongest in different frequency regions: (1) interaural level differences (e.g., head shadow), which are largest at higher frequencies, and (2) interaural time differences, which have their greatest contribution at lower frequencies. Binaural interactions enhance the separation of signals from noise through the use of these interaural differences. Here, the benefit attributable to spatial separation was measured as a function of the low- and high-pass cutoff frequency of speech and noise. Listeners were younger adults with normal hearing, older adults with normal hearing, and older adults with hearing loss. Binaural thresholds for narrowband noises were measured in quiet and in a speech-shaped masker as a function of masker low-pass cutoff frequency. Speech levels corresponding to 50% correct recognition of sentences from the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) were measured in a 65-dB SPL speech-shaped noise. Thresholds for narrowband noises and for speech were measured with two loudspeaker configurations: (1) signals and speech-shaped noise at 0° azimuth (in front of the listener) and (2) signals at 0° azimuth and speech-shaped noise at 90° azimuth (at the listener's side). The criterion measure was spatial separation benefit, or the difference in thresholds for the two conditions. Benefit of spatial separation for unfiltered speech averaged 6.1 dB for younger listeners with normal hearing, 4.9 dB for older listeners with normal hearing, and 2.7 dB for older listeners with hearing loss. Benefit was differentially affected by low-pass and high-pass filtering, suggesting a trade-off of the contributions of higher frequency interaural level differences and lower frequency interaural timing cues. As expected, older listeners with hearing loss benefited little from the improved signal-to-noise ratios in the higher frequencies resulting from head shadow, but showed some benefit from lower frequency cues. Spatial benefit for older listeners with normal hearing was reduced relative to benefit for younger listeners. This result may be related to older listeners' elevated thresholds at frequencies above 6.0 kHz.

KEY WORDS: speech recognition in noise, hearing loss, aging, binaural hearing, spatial separation

Submitted on May 1, 2001
Accepted on April 16, 2002

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Pennington, K. Thomson, P. James, L. Martin, and R. McNally Effects of It Takes Two to Talk--The Hanen Program for Parents of Preschool Children With Cerebral Palsy: Findings From an Exploratory Study J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2009; 52(5): 1121 - 1138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Marrone, C. R. Mason, and G. Kidd Jr Evaluating the Benefit of Hearing Aids in Solving the Cocktail Party Problem Trends in Amplification, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 300 - 315. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Dubno, J. B. Ahlstrom, and A. R. Horwitz Binaural Advantage for Younger and Older Adults With Normal Hearing J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2008; 51(2): 539 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Fey, S. F. Warren, N. Brady, L. H. Finestack, S. L. Bredin-Oja, M. Fairchild, S. Sokol, and P. J. Yoder Early effects of responsivity education/prelinguistic milieu teaching for children with developmental delays and their parents. J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2006; 49(3): 526 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]