JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.45 1285-1296 December 2002. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/103)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Formby, C.
Right arrow Articles by Aleksandrovsky, I. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Formby, C.
Right arrow Articles by Aleksandrovsky, I. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Temporal Integration of Sinusoidal Increments in the Absence of Absolute Energy Cues

C. Formby 1
M. G. Heinz 2

I. V. Aleksandrovsky 1

1 Division of Otolaryngology—HNS University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore
2 Speech and Hearing Sciences Program Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge

cformby{at}smail.umaryland.edu

Classical temporal integration (TI) is often viewed as a frequency-dependent, energy-based detection process. Detection thresholds for brief sinusoidal increments in either a fixed-level or a random-level broadband pedestal are reported that refute this traditional perspective of TI. Instead, evidence is presented that indicates (a) detection of absolute energy is not necessary for the TI effect and (b) the frequency dependence of TI is consistent with variations across frequency in peripheral auditory tuning, rather than the integration process per se. When peripheral frequency selectivity is controlled, TI can be explained by a frequencyinvariant integration process over at least the frequency range from 500 to 4000 Hz. This process is characterized by threshold improvements of 8–9 dB per decade increase in duration for increment durations between 10 and 300 ms.

KEY WORDS: temporal integration, energy detection, increment detection, roving-level paradigm, masked detection

Submitted on April 12, 2001
Accepted on April 9, 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.