JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.45 1219-1231 December 2002. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/098)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rescorla, L.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rescorla, L.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Nominal Versus Verbal Morpheme Use in Late Talkers at Ages 3 and 4

Leslie Rescorla 1
Julie Roberts 2

1 Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr, PA
2 University of Vermont Burlington

lrescorl{at}brynmawr.edu

Late talkers with normal receptive language and typically developing peers matched at 24- to 31-month intake on socieoeconomic status and nonverbal cognitive skills were compared at age 3 (N=29, 20) and age 4 (N=37, 16) on grammatical morpheme suppliance during speech samples. Age 4 late talkers differed from age 3 MLU-matched typically developing children on only the contractible copula. At age 4, "late bloomers" did not differ from typically developing children on any morpheme, but late talkers with "continuing delay" differed from comparison children on articles, nominative case pronouns, auxiliary be, and the contractible copula. Noun phrase morphemes were acquired earlier than verb phrase morphemes by both late talkers and comparison children, a nominal-verbal morpheme "decalage" that was first reported by R. Brown (1973). Results suggested that our late talkers did not have a selective deficit in verb morphology relative to their MLU. Findings are discussed in terms of a spectrum of SLI, with both late talkers and preschoolers with SLI hypothesized to have weaker endowments for language learning than typically developing children, but with late talkers being less impaired and thus closer to normal on this spectrum.

KEY WORDS: late talkers, grammatical morphemes, SLI spectrum, nominal versus verbal morphemes

Submitted on January 25, 2002
Accepted on June 26, 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language Learning and EducationHome page
E. M. Roos and S. E. Weismer
Language Outcomes of Late Talking Toddlers at Preschool and Beyond
Language Learning and Education, October 1, 2008; 15(3): 119 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
M. R. Luinge, W. J. Post, H. P. Wit, and S. M. Goorhuis-Brouwer
The ordering of milestones in language development for children from 1 to 6 years of age.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2006; 49(5): 923 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.