Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.45 421-433 June 2002. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/033)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weismer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Laures, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weismer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Laures, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Direct Magnitude Estimates of Speech Intelligibility in Dysarthria

Effects of a Chosen Standard

Gary Weismer 1
Jacqueline S. Laures 2

1 Department of Communicative Disorders and Waisman Center University of Wisconsin-Madison
2 Program in Communication Disorders Georgia State University Atlanta

weismer{at}waisman.wisc.edu

Direct magnitude estimation (DME) has been used frequently as a perceptual scaling technique in studies of the speech intelligibility of persons with speech disorders. The technique is typically used with a standard, or reference stimulus, chosen as a good exemplar of "midrange" intelligibility. In several published studies, the standard has been chosen subjectively, usually on the basis of the expertise of the investigators. The current experiment demonstrates that a fixed set of sentence-level utterances, obtained from 4 individuals with dysarthria (2 with Parkinson disease, 2 with traumatic brain injury) as well as 3 neurologically normal speakers, is scaled differently depending on the identity of the standard. Four different standards were used in the main experiment, three of which were judged qualitatively in two independent evaluations to be good exemplars of midrange intelligibility. Acoustic analyses did not reveal obvious differences between these four standards but suggested that the standard with the worstscaled intelligibility had much poorer voice source characteristics compared to the other three standards. Results are discussed in terms of possible standardization of midrange intelligibility exemplars for DME experiments.

KEY WORDS: speech intelligibility, perceptual scaling, dysarthria

Submitted on June 26, 2001
Accepted on January 3, 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language Learning and EducationHome page
K. C. Hustad
Speech Intelligibility in Children With Speech Disorders
Language Learning and Education, January 1, 2012; 19(1): 7 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
M. McHenry
An Exploration of Listener Variability in Intelligibility Judgments
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2011; 20(2): 119 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
T. L. Eadie and M. Kapsner-Smith
The Effect of Listener Experience and Anchors on Judgments of Dysphonia
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2011; 54(2): 430 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Telemed TelecareHome page
G. A. Constantinescu, D. G. Theodoros, T. G. Russell, E. C. Ward, S. J. Wilson, and R. Wootton
Home-based speech treatment for Parkinson's disease delivered remotely: a case report
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, March 1, 2010; 16(2): 100 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
D. J. Zajac, A. A. Harris, J. E. Roberts, and G. E. Martin
Direct Magnitude Estimation of Articulation Rate in Boys With Fragile X Syndrome
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2009; 52(5): 1370 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
A. T. Neel
Effects of Loud and Amplified Speech on Sentence and Word Intelligibility in Parkinson Disease
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2009; 52(4): 1021 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
N. J. Donovan, D. L. Kendall, M. E. Young, and J. C. Rosenbek
The Communicative Effectiveness Survey: Preliminary Evidence of Construct Validity
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2008; 17(4): 335 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. W. Ellis and S. A. Beltyukova
Effects of Training on Naive Listeners' Judgments of the Speech Intelligibility of Children With Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2008; 51(5): 1114 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. A. Beltyukova, G. M. Stone, and L. W. Ellis
Rasch Analysis of Word Identification and Magnitude Estimation Scaling Responses in Measuring Naive Listeners' Judgments of Speech Intelligibility of Children With Severe-to-Profound Hearing Impairments
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2008; 51(5): 1124 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]