JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.45 372-383 April 2002. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/029)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, P.
Right arrow Articles by Winship, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, P.
Right arrow Articles by Winship, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Adults' Judgments of Fictional Story Quality

Phyllis Schneider 1
Stephanie Winship 1
1 University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

phyllis.schneider{at}ualberta.ca

Narratives are commonly used for research and clinical purposes, but the ecological validity of our analyses needs verification. Do our macrostructural and microstructural narrative analysis methods give us an accurate picture of what would generally be considered "story quality"?

We addressed this question by using 39 untrained adult judges who were presented with sets of brief stories, each set constructed to vary on a single story aspect (story grammar elements, story grammar structural pattern, referring expressions, or connectives). Judges ranked the stories in each set from best to worst. Results indicate that judges were generally sensitive to story features commonly used in narrative analyses, including characters' thoughts and feelings, goal-directedness, adequacy of referent introductions, and connectedness of clauses. However, they failed to make distinctions between stories that differed in types of connectives or referring expressions and had mixed reactions to description in stories.

KEY WORDS: narratives, narrative assessment, story grammar, cohesion, stories

Submitted on September 28, 2001
Accepted on January 8, 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JSLHRHome page
R. M. Newman and K. K. McGregor
Teachers and Laypersons Discern Quality Differences Between Narratives Produced by Children With or Without SLI.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2006; 49(5): 1022 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AJSLPHome page
L. M. Justice, R. P. Bowles, J. N. Kaderavek, T. A. Ukrainetz, S. L. Eisenberg, and R. B. Gillam
The Index of Narrative Microstructure: A Clinical Tool for Analyzing School-Age Children's Narrative Performances.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2006; 15(2): 177 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.