JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.45 243-255 April 2002. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/019)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, M.
Right arrow Articles by Packman, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, M.
Right arrow Articles by Packman, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Statistical Power in Stuttering Research

A Tutorial

Mark Jones 1
Val Gebski 1
Mark Onslow 2

Ann Packman 2

1 National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Clinical Trials Centre The University of Sydney Australia
2 Australian Stuttering Research Centre The University of Sydney Australia

M.Onslow{at}fhs.usyd.edu.au

The capacity to make reliable inductive statements about populations is critical for the advancement of scientific knowledge. An important contribution to that advancement of knowledge is determining that effects are either present or not present in populations. Statistical power is an important methodological qualifica-tion for any research that presents statistical results, and particularly so for research that presents null results. In this paper we describe the statistical concept of power, outline parameters of research that influence it, and demonstrate how it is calculated. With reference to selected published research, attention is drawn to the problems associated with a body of underpowered research, one being that population effects may go undetected. One way to prevent this problem is to calculate power a priori in planning research and include confidence intervals when presenting the results of research. However, it is difficult, if not impossible in many cases, to obtain high participant numbers for communication disorders of low prevalence such as stuttering. With this in mind, the paper concludes with an attempt to open discussion about ways to redress the problems associated with statistical power.

KEY WORDS: statistics, power, stuttering

Submitted on July 31, 2001
Accepted on November 21, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
M. Onslow, M. Jones, S. O'Brian, R. Menzies, and A. Packman
Defining, Identifying, and Evaluating Clinical Trials of Stuttering Treatments: A Tutorial for Clinicians
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2008; 17(4): 401 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
J. D. Anderson and C. T. Byrd
Phonotactic Probability Effects in Children Who Stutter
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2008; 51(4): 851 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
J. H. Davidow, A. K. Bothe, and R. E. Bramlett
The Stuttering Treatment Research Evaluation and Assessment Tool (STREAT): Evaluating Treatment Research as Part of Evidence-Based Practice.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2006; 15(2): 126 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.