General Slowing in Language Impairment

Methodological Considerations in Testing the Hypothesis

windsor{at}umn.edu

Although the general slowing hypothesis of language impairment (LI) is well established, the conventional method to test the hypothesis is controversial. This paper compares the usual method, ordinary least squares regression (OLS), with another method, hierarchical linear modeling with random coefficients (HLM). The analyses used available response time (RT) data from studies of perceptual-motor, cognitive, and language skills of LI and chronological-age-matched (CA) groups. The data set included RT measures from 25 studies investigating 20 different tasks (e.g., auditory detection, mental rotation, and word recognition tasks). OLS and HLM analyses of the RT data yielded very different results. OLS supported general slowing for the LI groups, and indicated that they were significantly slower than CA groups across studies by an overall estimate of 10%. HLM indicated a larger average extent of LI slowing (18%). However, the variability around this average was much greater than that yielded by OLS, and the extent of slowing was not statistically significant. Importantly, HLM showed a significant difference in the RT relation between LI and CA groups across studies, indicating that study-specific slowing, rather than general slowing across studies, was present. A separate HLM analysis of two types of language tasks, picture naming and word recognition, was performed. Although the extent of slowing was equivalent across these tasks, the slowing was minimal (2%) and not significant. Methodological limitations of each analysis to assess general slowing are highlighted.

KEY WORDS: general slowing, language impairment, children, response time, hierarchical linear modeling

Submitted on June 2, 2000
Accepted on January 3, 2001

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. Montgomery, B. M. Magimairaj, and M. C. Finney Working Memory and Specific Language Impairment: An Update on the Relation and Perspectives on Assessment and Treatment Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2010; 19(1): 78 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Spaulding, E. Plante, and R. Vance Sustained Selective Attention Skills of Preschool Children With Specific Language Impairment: Evidence for Separate Attentional Capacities J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2008; 51(1): 16 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Montgomery and J. Windsor Examining the Language Performances of Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment: Contributions of Phonological Short-Term Memory and Speed of Processing J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2007; 50(3): 778 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. B. Leonard, S. Ellis Weismer, C. A. Miller, D. J. Francis, J. B. Tomblin, and R. V. Kail Speed of Processing, Working Memory, and Language Impairment in Children J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2007; 50(2): 408 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Montgomery and L. B. Leonard Effects of Acoustic Manipulation on the Real-Time Inflectional Processing of Children With Specific Language Impairment J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2006; 49(6): 1238 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Miller, L. B. Leonard, R. V. Kail, X. Zhang, J. B. Tomblin, and D. J. Francis Response Time in 14-Year-Olds With Language Impairment J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2006; 49(4): 712 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]