JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.44 434-445 April 2001. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/035)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rescorla, L.
Right arrow Articles by Alley, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rescorla, L.
Right arrow Articles by Alley, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Validation of the Language Development Survey (LDS)

A Parent Report Tool for Identifying Language Delay in Toddlers

Leslie Rescorla 1
Amie Alley 1

1 Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr, PA

lrescorl{at}brynmawr.edu

Two studies are reported demonstrating the reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the Language Development Survey (LDS; L. Rescorla, 1989) as a screening tool for the identification of expressive language delay in toddlers. In Study 1, 422 children (ages 24–26 months) were screened with the LDS in an epidemiological survey. The LDS manifested excellent concurrent validity with a brief direct screening measure of expressive vocabulary. Using the Rescorla (1989) Delay 3 cutoff of fewer than 50 words or no word combinations, 9.7% of the sample were language delayed (32 boys, 9 girls). In Study 2, 33 children identified as "at-risk" by the LDS Delay 3 cutoff and 33 typically developing children, matched on age, socioeconomic status, and gender, were seen for in-depth follow-up assessment approximately 3 weeks later. The LDS test-retest reliability was.97. The LDS correlated highly with Reynell Receptive and Expressive Language Scale scores, Bayley Mental Development Index, and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Composite. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value between the screening LDS and the follow-up Reynell Expressive Language Scale were generally impressive. Finally, the at-risk group scored significantly lower than the LDS-identified typically developing group on all follow-up measures except the Child Behavior Checklist/2–3.

KEY WORDS: language screening, parent report vocabulary checklist, expressive language delay, instrument validation, toddler language delay

Submitted on August 18, 2000
Accepted on December 21, 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. McLeod and L. J. Harrison
Epidemiology of Speech and Language Impairment in a Nationally Representative Sample of 4- to 5-Year-Old Children
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2009; 52(5): 1213 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
S. Q. Cabell, L. M. Justice, T. A. Zucker, and C. R. Kilday
Validity of Teacher Report for Assessing the Emergent Literacy Skills of At-Risk Preschoolers
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 161 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically DiverHome page
M. Guiberson
Concurrent Validity of a Parent Survey Measuring Communication Skills of Spanish Speaking Preschoolers with and without Delayed Language
Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations, October 1, 2008; 15(3): 73 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
P. Hargrove, M. Griffer, and B. Lund
Procedures for Using Clinical Practice Guidelines
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 289 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. R. Zubrick, C. L. Taylor, M. L. Rice, and D. W. Slegers
Late Language Emergence at 24 Months: An Epidemiological Study of Prevalence, Predictors, and Covariates
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2007; 50(6): 1562 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AutismHome page
E. K. Delinicolas and R. L. Young
Joint attention, language, social relating, and stereotypical behaviours in children with autistic disorder
Autism, September 1, 2007; 11(5): 425 - 436.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. Rescorla, G. S. Ross, and S. McClure
Language Delay and Behavioral/Emotional Problems in Toddlers: Findings From Two Developmental Clinics
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2007; 50(4): 1063 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
D. Thal, J. L. DesJardin, and L. S. Eisenberg
Validity of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories for Measuring Language Abilities in Children With Cochlear Implants
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 54 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
M. R. Luinge, W. J. Post, H. P. Wit, and S. M. Goorhuis-Brouwer
The Ordering of Milestones in Language Development for Children From 1 to 6 Years of Age
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2006; 49(5): 923 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
US Preventive Services Task Force
Screening for Speech and Language Delay in Preschool Children: Recommendation Statement
Pediatrics, February 1, 2006; 117(2): 497 - 501.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
H. D. Nelson, P. Nygren, M. Walker, and R. Panoscha
Screening for Speech and Language Delay in Preschool Children: Systematic Evidence Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
Pediatrics, February 1, 2006; 117(2): e298 - e319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
T. J. Spaulding, E. Plante, and K. A. Farinella
Eligibility Criteria for Language Impairment: Is the Low End of Normal Always Appropriate?
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 61 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.