JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.44 19-28 February 2001. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/002)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackersie, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stiles, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mackersie, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stiles, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Role of Sequential Stream Segregation and Frequency Selectivity in the Perception of Simultaneous Sentences by Listeners With Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Carol L. Mackersie 1
Tammy L. Prida 1

Derek Stiles 1

1 San Diego State University San Diego, CA

cmackers{at}mail.sdsu.edu

The purpose of this study was to determine the role of frequency selectivity and sequential stream segregation in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Simultaneous sentence perception was tested in listeners with normal hearing and with sensorineural hearing loss using sentence pairs consisting of one sentence spoken by a male talker and one sentence spoken by a female talker. Listeners were asked to repeat both sentences and were scored on the number of words repeated correctly in each sentence. Separate scores were obtained for the first and second sentences repeated. Frequency selectivity was assessed using a notched-noise method in which thresholds for a 1000 Hz pure-tone signal were measured in noise with spectral notch bandwidths of 0, 300, and 600 Hz. Sequential stream segregation was measured using tone sequences consisting of a fixed frequency (A) and a varying frequency tone (B). Tone sequences were presented in an ABA_ABA_... pattern starting at a frequency (B) either below or above the frequency of the fixed 1000 Hz tone (A). Initially, the frequency difference was large and was gradually decreased until listeners indicated that they could no longer perceptually separate the two tones (fusion threshold).

Scores for the first sentence repeated decreased significantly with increasing age. There was a strong relationship between fusion threshold and simultaneous sentence perception, which remained even after partialling out the effects of age. Smaller frequency differences at fusion thresholds were associated with higher sentence scores. There was no relationship between frequency selectivity and simultaneous sentence perception. Results suggest that the abilities to perceptually separate pitch patterns and separate sentences spoken simultaneously by different talkers are mediated by the same underlying perceptual and/or cognitive factors.

KEY WORDS: streaming, frequency selectivity, competing sentences, speech perception, hearing loss

Submitted on January 25, 2000
Accepted on October 19, 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
J. Rossi-Katz and K. H. Arehart
Message and Talker Identification in Older Adults: Effects of Task, Distinctiveness of the Talkers' Voices, and Meaningfulness of the Competing Message
J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2009; 52(2): 435 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
A. J. Oxenham
Pitch Perception and Auditory Stream Segregation: Implications for Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implants
Trends in Amplification, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 316 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
TRENDS AMPLIFHome page
B. G. Shinn-Cunningham and V. Best
Selective Attention in Normal and Impaired Hearing
Trends in Amplification, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 283 - 299.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
S. Valentine and J. J. Lentz
Broadband Auditory Stream Segregation by Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2008; 51(5): 1341 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
T. Vongpaisal and M. K. Pichora-Fuller
Effect of Age on F0 Difference Limen and Concurrent Vowel Identification
J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2007; 50(5): 1139 - 1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. S. Snyder and C. Alain
Sequential Auditory Scene Analysis Is Preserved in Normal Aging Adults
Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2007; 17(3): 501 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
J. J. Lentz and S. L. Marsh
The Effect of Hearing Loss on Identification of Asynchronous Double Vowels
J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2006; 49(6): 1354 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.