JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.43 1115-1125 October 2000.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grela, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grela, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, L. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Influence of Argument-Structure Complexity on the Use of Auxiliary Verbs by Children With SLI

Bernard G. Grela 1
Laurence B. Leonard 1

1 Purdue University West Lafayette, IN

bgrela{at}uconn.edu

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of argument-structure complexity on the omission of auxiliary be verbs in a group of children with specific language impairment (SLI). These children were compared to a group of younger, normally developing children matched for mean length of utterance (MLU) and a group of children matched for chronological age (CA). Using a story-completion task, the children (N=30) were required to produce sentences of varying length and argument-structure complexity. The results of the study indicated that the children with SLI omitted more auxiliary forms than either the MLU or CA controls. In addition, both the children with SLI and the MLU controls were more likely to omit the auxiliary forms when attempting sentences with greater argument-structure complexity. These results suggest that argumentstructure complexity may be a contributing factor to children's omissions of grammatical morphemes.

KEY WORDS: SLI, argument structure, auxiliary BE

Submitted on October 4, 1999
Accepted on July 5, 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
E. Thordardottir
Language-Specific Effects of Task Demands on the Manifestation of Specific Language Impairment: A Comparison of English and Icelandic
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2008; 51(4): 922 - 937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
F. Pizzioli and M.-A. Schelstraete
The Argument-Structure Complexity Effect in Children With Specific Language Impairment: Evidence From the Use of Grammatical Morphemes in French
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2008; 51(3): 706 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
A. J. Owen and L. B. Leonard
The production of finite and nonfinite complement clauses by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers.
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2006; 49(3): 548 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. C. Ziegler, C. Pech-Georgel, F. George, F.-X. Alario, and C. Lorenzi
Deficits in speech perception predict language learning impairment
PNAS, September 27, 2005; 102(39): 14110 - 14115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.