Children's Phoneme Identification in Reverberation and Noise

johns19{at}mail.Auburn.edu

This study assessed the effects of reverberation, noise, and their combination on listeners' identification of consonants and vowels in naturally produced nonsense syllables presented at different sensation levels (re: speech recognition threshold). A secondary purpose of this study was to assess listeners' identification of voicing, manner, and place of articulation for consonants at 50 dB SL in the reverberation, noise, and combined conditions. Listeners, aged 6–30 years, identified consonant-vowel-consonant-vowel (CVCV) stimuli presented at four different sensation levels (re: speech recognition threshold) of 30, 40, 50, and 60 dB SL in 4 listening conditions: (a) an optimal listening situation (no reverberation, no noise), (b) reverberation only (1.3 seconds), (c) noise only (+13 dB S/N against a multitalker babble), and (d) reverberation plus noise. Results showed that all listener groups achieved maximum consonant identification performance at 50 dB SL. Vowel identification scores were unaffected by SL. Statistical analyses revealed that children's ability to identify consonants varied according to listening condition. For example, children's consonant identification abilities reached adult-like levels of performance at about age 14 years in the reverberation-only and noise-only listening conditions. However, in the reverberation-plus-noise listening condition, children's consonant identification abilities do not mature until the late teenage years. The ability to identify vowels, on the other hand, develops much earlier. A feature analysis of the consonant data showed that for all 3 features (voicing, manner, and place), identification scores were highest in the control condition, similar for the reverberation-only and noise-only conditions, and lowest in the reverberation-plus-noise condition. Voicing was easier for listeners to identify than manner or place of articulation features in reverberation and noise. Taken together, these results suggest that the ability to identify speech in reverberation and noise reaches adult-like level of performance at different ages for different components of the speech signal.

KEY WORDS: children, speech perception, noise, reverberation

Submitted on March 20, 1998
Accepted on June 2, 1999

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Choi, A. Lotto, D. Lewis, B. Hoover, and P. Stelmachowicz Attentional Modulation of Word Recognition by Children in a Dual-Task Paradigm J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2008; 51(4): 1042 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Larsen, A. Vega, and J. E. Ribera The Effect of Room Acoustics and Sound-Field Amplification on Word Recognition Performance in Young Adult Listeners in Suboptimal Listening Conditions Am J Audiol, June 1, 2008; 17(1): 50 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Baker, P. Trofimovich, J. E. Flege, M. Mack, and R. Halter Child-adult differences in second-language phonological learning: the role of cross-language similarity. Language and Speech, January 1, 2008; 51(Pt 4): 317 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. F. Holt and A. E. Carney Developmental Effects of Multiple Looks in Speech Sound Discrimination J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2007; 50(6): 1404 - 1424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Poulsen, T. W. Picton, and T. Paus Age-Related Changes in Transient and Oscillatory Brain Responses to Auditory Stimulation in Healthy Adults 19-45 Years Old Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1454 - 1467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]