JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.42 1414-1431 December 1999.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dromi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dromi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Verb Agreement Morphology in Hebrew-Speaking Children With Specific Language Impairment

Esther Dromi 1
Laurence B. Leonard 2
Galit Adam 3

Sara Zadunaisky-Ehrlich 3

1 Tel Aviv University, Israel The University of Texas at Dallas
2 Purdue University West Lafayette, IN
3 Tel Aviv University, Israel

xdxl{at}purdue.edu

Earlier reports of verb morphology use by Hebrew-speaking children with specific language impairment (SLI) have suggested that these children mark agreement with the subject as accurately as younger control children matched according to mean length of utterance (MLU). This issue was examined in greater detail in the present study by including a wider range of agreement inflections from the present and past tense paradigms and employing verbs of different patterns (binyanim). It was hypothesized that children with SLI would be more limited than would MLU controls in their use of agreement inflections within past tense because the past tense agreement paradigm of Hebrew requires the simultaneous manipulation of three features—person, number, and gender. Differences between the groups were not expected for the use of agreement inflections within present tense, because only two features—number and gender—must be manipulated in the present tense paradigm. A group of preschool-age children with SLI was found to have more difficulty than did MLU controls in the use of most past tense agreement inflections. Within present tense, the two groups differed in their use of agreement inflections in only one pattern. For both groups, most errant productions differed from the target form by only one feature, usually person or tense. We found no feature that was consistently problematic for the children. The findings are discussed within a limited processing capacity framework.

KEY WORDS: specific language impairment, verb morphology, grammatical morphology, Hebrew, crosslinguistic study

Submitted on July 27, 1998
Accepted on April 20, 1999


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
L. H. Finestack and M. E. Fey
Evaluation of a Deductive Procedure to Teach Grammatical Inflections to Children With Language Impairment
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 289 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
A. Lukacs, L. B. Leonard, B. Kas, and C. Pleh
The Use of Tense and Agreement by Hungarian-Speaking Children With Language Impairment
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2009; 52(1): 98 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.