JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.42 1285-1294 December 1999.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rakerd, B.
Right arrow Articles by Velde, T. J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rakerd, B.
Right arrow Articles by Velde, T. J. V.

Loudness Discrimination of Speech Signals Spectrally Shaped by a Simulated Hearing Aid

Brad Rakerd 1
Jerry Punch 1
Willard Hooks 1
Amyn Amlani 1

Timothy J. Vander Velde 1

1 Department of Audiology and Speech Sciences Michigan State University East Lansing

rakerd{at}pilot.msu.edu.

A discrimination task was used to assess changes in the loudness of speech that accompanied changes in the spectral tilt of a simulated hearing aid's frequency response. Band-limited (0.25–4 kHz) spondaic words were spectrally shaped at comparison tilt-factor values of –6, 0, and +6 dB per octave and delivered monaurally via insert earphone to each of 10 listeners with normal hearing (NH) and 15 listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing impairment (HI). Results for the NH listeners indicated that loudness differences among the tilt factors were generally perceptible and that loudness judgments were highly transitive across different tilt-factor comparisons. Loudness differences were also perceptible to many of the HI listeners when they switched among tilt factors. The HI listeners' data showed some evidence of transitivity, but not so much as was shown by the NH listeners. Intersubject variability in the loudness judgments was found to be comparable for the two subject groups. Results of the study are discussed with regard to their implications for hearing aid fitting, with particular emphasis on the "parameter adjustment and selection" fitting procedure (J. Punch & R. Robb, 1992).

KEY WORDS: hearing, hearing aids, programmable hearing aids, fitting, loudness

Submitted on November 16, 1998
Accepted on April 19, 1999







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.