Early Childhood Stuttering I

Persistency and Recovery Rates

e-yairi{at}uiuc.edu

The divergent developmental course of stuttering with its two major paths, persistency and spontaneous (unaided) recovery, has been a focus of scientific attention because of its critical theoretical, research, and clinical perspectives. Issues concerning factors underlying persistency and recovery and their implications for early intervention have stirred considerable controversy among scientists. In light of the intense interest, the scarcity of direct essential epidemiological data concerning the magnitude of the two paths and the timing of recovery is problematic. Most past studies have used retrospective methodologies. The few longitudinal studies have been severely limited in scope or objective data. The purpose of the investigation reported herein is to study the pathognomonic course of stuttering during its first several years in early childhood with special reference to the occurrence of persistent and spontaneously recovered forms of the disorder. Employing longitudinal methodology with thorough, frequent periodic follow-up observations, multiple testing, and recording of extensive speech samples, 147 preschool children who stutter have been closely followed for several years from near the onset of stuttering. In this, the first of three related articles, we present findings regarding the current stuttering status of 84 of these children, who have been followed for a minimum of 4 years after their onset of stuttering. The data indicate continuous diminution in the frequency and severity of stuttering over time as many children progressed toward recovery. Our findings lead to conservative estimates of 74% overall recovery and 26% persistency rates. The process of reaching complete recovery varied in length among the children and was distributed over a period of 4 years after onset. Detailed analyses of phonological and language skills pertaining to differentiation of the developmental paths of children who persist and those who recover are presented in the two other articles in the series (E. P. Paden et al., 1999, and R. V. Watkins et al., 1999).

KEY WORDS: stuttering, disfluency, childhood, development, subtypes

Submitted on February 23, 1998
Accepted on March 12, 1999

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Kell, K. Neumann, K. von Kriegstein, C. Posenenske, A. W. von Gudenberg, H. Euler, and A.-L. Giraud How the brain repairs stuttering Brain, October 1, 2009; 132(10): 2747 - 2760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Miller and B. Guitar Long-Term Outcome of the Lidcombe Program for Early Stuttering Intervention Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2009; 18(1): 42 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Anderson and C. T. Byrd Phonotactic Probability Effects in Children Who Stutter J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2008; 51(4): 851 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Millard, A. Nicholas, and F. M. Cook Is Parent-Child Interaction Therapy Effective in Reducing Stuttering? J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2008; 51(3): 636 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Howell, S. Davis, and R. Williams Late Childhood Stuttering J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2008; 51(3): 669 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Coleman, J. S. Yaruss, and D. Hammer Clinical Research Involving Preschoolers Who Stutter: Real-World Applications of Evidence-Based Practice Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, July 1, 2007; 38(3): 286 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Dworzynski, A. Remington, F. Rijsdijk, P. Howell, and R. Plomin Genetic Etiology in Cases of Recovered and Persistent Stuttering in an Unselected, Longitudinal Sample of Young Twins Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2007; 16(2): 169 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. T. Byrd, E. G. Conture, and R. N. Ohde Phonological Priming in Young Children Who Stutter: Holistic Versus Incremental Processing Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 43 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kalinowski, T. Saltuklaroglu, A. Stuart, and V. K. Guntupalli On the Importance of Scientific Rhetoric in Stuttering: A Reply to Finn, Bothe, and Bramlett (2005) Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 69 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Anderson Phonological Neighborhood and Word Frequency Effects in the Stuttered Disfluencies of Children Who Stutter J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2007; 50(1): 229 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. McKinnon, S. McLeod, and S. Reilly The Prevalence of Stuttering, Voice, and Speech-Sound Disorders in Primary School Students in Australia Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, January 1, 2007; 38(1): 5 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. W. Blood, I. M. Blood, K. Maloney, A. V. Weaver, and B. Shaffer Exploratory Study of Children Who Stutter and Those Who Do Not Stutter on a Visual Attention Test Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 2007; 28(3): 145 - 153. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. K. Bothe, J. H. Davidow, R. E. Bramlett, and R. J. Ingham Stuttering treatment research 1970-2005: I. Systematic review incorporating trial quality assessment of behavioral, cognitive, and related approaches. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2006; 15(4): 321 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Yaruss, C. Coleman, and D. Hammer Treating preschool children who stutter: description and preliminary evaluation of a family-focused treatment approach. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, April 1, 2006; 37(2): 118 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Sawyer and E. Yairi The effect of sample size on the assessment of stuttering severity. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 36 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Jones, M. Onslow, A. Packman, S. Williams, T. Ormond, I. Schwarz, and V. Gebski Randomised controlled trial of the Lidcombe programme of early stuttering intervention BMJ, September 24, 2005; 331(7518): 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]