| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
sgordon{at}bss1.umd.edu
This investigation examined age-related performance differences on a range of speech and nonspeech measures involving temporal manipulation of acoustic signals and variation of stimulus complexity. The goal was to identify a subset of temporally mediated measures that effectively distinguishes the performance patterns of younger and older listeners, with and without hearing loss. The nonspeech measures included duration discrimination for simple tones and gaps, duration discrimination for tones and gaps embedded within complex sequences, and discrimination of temporal order. The speech measures were undistorted speech, time-compressed speech, reverberant speech, and combined time-compressed + reverberant speech. All speech measures were presented both in quiet and in noise. Strong age effects were observed for the nonspeech measures, particularly in the more complex stimulus conditions. Additionally, age effects were observed for all time-compressed speech conditions and some reverberant speech conditions, in both quiet and noise. Effects of hearing loss were observed also for the speech measures only. Discriminant function analysis derived a formula, based on a subset of these measures, for classifying individuals according to temporal performance consistent with age and hearing loss categories. The most important measures to accomplish this goal involved conditions featuring temporal manipulations of complex speech and nonspeech signals.
KEY WORDS: aging, temporal processing, speech perception, psychoacoustics, hearing loss
Submitted on August 10, 1998
Accepted on November 2, 1998
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Valentine and J. J. Lentz Broadband Auditory Stream Segregation by Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2008; 51(5): 1341 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.-F. Shi and K. A. Doherty Subjective and Objective Effects of Fast and Slow Compression on the Perception of Reverberant Speech in Listeners With Hearing Loss J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2008; 51(5): 1328 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. H. Gifford, S. P. Bacon, and E. J. Williams An Examination of Speech Recognition in a Modulated Background and of Forward Masking in Younger and Older Listeners J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2007; 50(4): 857 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. E. Humes, M. H. Burk, M. P. Coughlin, T. A. Busey, and L. E. Strauser Auditory Speech Recognition and Visual Text Recognition in Younger and Older Adults: Similarities and Differences Between Modalities and the Effects of Presentation Rate J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2007; 50(2): 283 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. J. Lister, R. A. Roberts, J. Shackelford, and C. L. Rogers An Adaptive Clinical Test of Temporal Resolution Am J Audiol, December 1, 2006; 15(2): 133 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. K. Pichora-Fuller and G. Singh Effects of Age on Auditory and Cognitive Processing: Implications for Hearing Aid Fitting and Audiologic Rehabilitation Trends in Amplification, March 1, 2006; 10(1): 29 - 59. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F.-G. Zeng, Y.-Y. Kong, H. J. Michalewski, and A. Starr Perceptual Consequences of Disrupted Auditory Nerve Activity J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3050 - 3063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASHA Journals | AJA | AJSLP | JSLHR | LSHSS |
