JSLHR
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research Vol.41 1363-1374 December 1998.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bortolini, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leonard, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bortolini, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Grammatical Morphology and the Role of Weak Syllables in the Speech of Italian-Speaking Children With Specific Language Impairment

Laurence B. Leonard 1
Umberta Bortolini 2

1 Purdue University West Lafayette, IN
2 Centro di Fonetica del CNR Padova, Italia

Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment (SLI) were compared to a group of younger control children in their use of auxiliary verbs, pronominal clitics, infinitives, present tense verb inflections, and articles. Differences favoring the control children were found for those morphemes that required the production of nonfinal weak syllables. On other grammatical morphemes, the two groups did not differ. A relationship was seen between the use of morphemes requiring nonfinal weak syllables and the use of nonfinal weak syllables that had no morpheme status. The findings are considered from the perspective of both prosodic production limitations and limitations in input processing.

KEY WORDS: specific language impairment, Italian, prosody, grammatical morphology, phonology

Submitted on November 3, 1997
Accepted on March 31, 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JSLHRHome page
J. Yung Song, M. Sundara, and K. Demuth
Phonological Constraints on Children's Production of English Third Person Singular -s
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2009; 52(3): 623 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
F. Pizzioli and M.-A. Schelstraete
The Argument-Structure Complexity Effect in Children With Specific Language Impairment: Evidence From the Use of Grammatical Morphemes in French
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2008; 51(3): 706 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
K. Corriveau, E. Pasquini, and U. Goswami
Basic Auditory Processing Skills and Specific Language Impairment: A New Look at an Old Hypothesis
J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2007; 50(3): 647 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
First LanguageHome page
K. Hansson, U. Nettelbladt, and L. B. Leonard
Indefinite Articles and Definite Forms in Swedish Children with Specific Language Impairment
First Language, October 1, 2003; 23(3): 343 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.