F0 Processing and the Seperation of Competing Speech Signals by Listeners With Normal Hearing and With Hearing Loss

Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners were tested to determine F0 difference limens for synthetic tokens of 5 steady-state vowels. The same stimuli were then used in a concurrent-vowel labeling task with the F0 difference between concurrent vowels ranging between 0 and 4 semitones. Finally, speech recognition was tested for synthetic sentences in the presence of a competing synthetic voice with the same, a higher, or a lower F0. Normal-hearing listeners and hearing-impaired listeners with small F0-discrimination (F0) thresholds showed improvements in vowel labeling when there were differences in F0 between vowels on the concurrent-vowel task. Impaired listeners with high F0 thresholds did not benefit from F0 differences between vowels. At the group level, normalhearing listeners benefited more than hearing-impaired listeners from F0 differences between competing signals on both the concurrent-vowel and sentence tasks. However, for individual listeners, F0 thresholds and improvements in concurrent-vowel labeling based on F0 differences were only weakly associated with F0-based improvements in performance on the sentence task. For both the concurrent-vowel and sentence tasks, there was evidence that the ability to benefit from F0 differences between competing signals decreases with age.

KEY WORDS: F0 processing, F0 discrimination, concurrent vowel identification, competing speech task, hearing impairment

Submitted on January 9, 1998
Accepted on August 5, 1998

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Rossi-Katz and K. H. Arehart Message and Talker Identification in Older Adults: Effects of Task, Distinctiveness of the Talkers' Voices, and Meaningfulness of the Competing Message J Speech Lang Hear Res, April 1, 2009; 52(2): 435 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Oxenham Pitch Perception and Auditory Stream Segregation: Implications for Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implants Trends in Amplification, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 316 - 331. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Larsen, L. Cedolin, and B. Delgutte Pitch Representations in the Auditory Nerve: Two Concurrent Complex Tones J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1301 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Vongpaisal and M. K. Pichora-Fuller Effect of Age on F0 Difference Limen and Concurrent Vowel Identification J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2007; 50(5): 1139 - 1156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Lentz and S. L. Marsh The Effect of Hearing Loss on Identification of Asynchronous Double Vowels J Speech Lang Hear Res, December 1, 2006; 49(6): 1354 - 1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Pichora-Fuller and G. Singh Effects of Age on Auditory and Cognitive Processing: Implications for Hearing Aid Fitting and Audiologic Rehabilitation Trends in Amplification, March 1, 2006; 10(1): 29 - 59. [Abstract] [PDF]